Re: /etc/issue vs /etc/issue.net in shell.c

On November 21, 2014 5:50:08 PM CST, Chris Johns wrote: >On 22/11/2014 1:53 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> On 11/21/2014 1:38 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 20/11/14 22:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi We have different code to process these two files on login. Can someone poin

Re: mmap implementation was Re: [PATCH 2/4] sys/mman.h: New file. Clean up and add supporting stubs

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Chris, Gedate.. please fill in gaps. > > > On 11/21/2014 4:06 AM, Thomas Kim wrote: > > Dear Joel, > > I am sorry. please let me know how to download these patch codes(source > code, makefile.am, pre-install.am, etc) for mmap implementation.

Re: [rtems commit] bsps/arm: Enable L2C for Cortex-A9 MPCore BSPs

On 21/11/2014 6:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 21/11/14 06:10, Chris Johns wrote: On 21/11/2014 12:53 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: Module:rtems Branch:master Commit:50440c065e247899ee739d56cb1392c259289031 Changeset: http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=50440c065e247899ee739d56cb1

Re: mmap implementation was Re: [PATCH 2/4] sys/mman.h: New file. Clean up and add supporting stubs

On 22/11/2014 2:09 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: Chris has an implementation of some of the capabilities but I don't recall which git repo. I thought about merging that code but it doesn't have tests, documentation or confdefs.h support so just brought over the header and added stubs. The repo is ht

Re: moxie tools fails - dtc not available

On 22/11/2014 3:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 11/21/2014 10:17 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: http://www.jdl.com/software/dtc-v1.2.0.tgz is no longer available and the download fails. The site appears to be dead. Any ideas where to fetch it from? http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Compiler poi

Re: [PATCH] 4.11/rtems-nios2.bset: Drop patch adding RTEMS target

On 22/11/2014 5:49 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: --- rtems/config/4.11/rtems-nios2.bset | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) Ok to push. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: /etc/issue vs /etc/issue.net in shell.c

On 22/11/2014 1:53 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 11/21/2014 1:38 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 20/11/14 22:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi We have different code to process these two files on login. Can someone point me to a standard source which says what is supposed to be handled in each one? Sh

Re: anyone else see sparc-rtems4.11 not building with RSB

I built a toolchain yesterday for sparc32. Check the build-log for the error message, the tail of the make is insufficient information. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > RSB report has: > > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-source-builder

anyone else see sparc-rtems4.11 not building with RSB

Hi RSB report has: make[1]: Leaving directory `/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-source-builder/rtems/build/sparc-rtems4.11-gdb-7.7-1/build' make: *** [all] Error 2 shell cmd failed: /bin/sh -ex /users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-source-builder/rtems/build/sparc-rtems4.11-gdb-7.7-1/doit error: bu

[PATCH] 4.11/rtems-nios2.bset: Drop patch adding RTEMS target

--- rtems/config/4.11/rtems-nios2.bset | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/4.11/rtems-nios2.bset b/rtems/config/4.11/rtems-nios2.bset index 41e6a12..ed76eac 100644 --- a/rtems/config/4.11/rtems-nios2.bset +++ b/rtems/config/4.11/rtems-nios2.bset @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@

RTEMS Open Classes in 2015

Hi The currently scheduled training sessions are: * January 25 - 30, 2015 in Huntsville Alabama. o For further information, visit the OAR RTEMS Training page . o Kick Start - Janurary 25, 2015 (Monday) in Huntsville Alabama: For

Re: moxie tools fails - dtc not available

On 11/21/2014 10:17 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > http://www.jdl.com/software/dtc-v1.2.0.tgz is no longer available > and the download fails. The site appears to be dead. > > Any ideas where to fetch it from? > http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Compiler points you to https://git.kernel.org/cgit/u

nios tools build failure

Hi Patch doesn't apply. I am guessing it isn't needed with 4.9.2 anymore. cd gcc-4.9.2 + /bin/chmod -R a+rX,g-w,o-w . + /bin/cat /users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-source-builder/rtems/patches/RTEMS-Add-Nios-2-support.patch + /usr/bin/patch -p1 patching file gcc/config.gcc Hunk #1 succeeded at 21

moxie tools fails - dtc not available

http://www.jdl.com/software/dtc-v1.2.0.tgz is no longer available and the download fails. The site appears to be dead. Any ideas where to fetch it from? -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications Research Ask me ab

Re: [PATCH] smp: Fix scheduler helping protocol

On 11/21/2014 10:07 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > From: Luca Bonato > > New test case for smptests/smpmrsp01. > > It possible that a state change from SCHEDULER_SMP_NODE_READY to > SCHEDULER_SMP_NODE_READY can happen. Fix English. How about a short description of the scenario this is addressing?

[PATCH] smp: Fix scheduler helping protocol

From: Luca Bonato New test case for smptests/smpmrsp01. It possible that a state change from SCHEDULER_SMP_NODE_READY to SCHEDULER_SMP_NODE_READY can happen. --- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/schedulerimpl.h | 28 ++-- .../score/include/rtems/score/schedulersmpimpl.h | 25 ++- testsuit

mmap implementation was Re: [PATCH 2/4] sys/mman.h: New file. Clean up and add supporting stubs

Chris, Gedate.. please fill in gaps. On 11/21/2014 4:06 AM, Thomas Kim wrote: > Dear Joel, > > I am sorry. please let me know how to download these patch > codes(source code, makefile.am , pre-install.am > , etc) for mmap implementation. > > At this time

Re: /etc/issue vs /etc/issue.net in shell.c

On 11/21/2014 1:38 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 20/11/14 22:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Hi >> >> We have different code to process these two files on login. >> Can someone point me to a standard source which says >> what is supposed to be handled in each one? >> >> Should we really have both pa

Re: [PATCH 04/22] dosfs: Avoid MIN() re-definition

Much better, thanks. I should have read all the email first, I was getting caught up on the last few days. I recall you asked about doing that. > On Nov 21, 2014, at 06:11 , Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 21/11/14 11:26, Peter Dufault wrote: >> I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests befo

Re: [PATCH 04/22] dosfs: Avoid MIN() re-definition

On 21/11/14 11:26, Peter Dufault wrote: I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests before defining something because how do you know it was defined compatibly? Granted MIN is well-known so that's less likely than other uses of this pattern. Can the definition be made identical to the other def

Re: [PATCH 04/22] dosfs: Avoid MIN() re-definition

I don't like these kind of "ifndef" tests before defining something because how do you know it was defined compatibly? Granted MIN is well-known so that's less likely than other uses of this pattern. Can the definition be made identical to the other definition to eliminate a warning or does GC

Re: [PATCH 2/4] sys/mman.h: New file. Clean up and add supporting stubs

Dear Joel, I am sorry. please let me know how to download these patch codes(source code, makefile.am, pre-install.am, etc) for mmap implementation. At this time, I am modified makefile.am for integrating mmp source code in gsoc2011-rtems-mmu-support-project. but, I was failed in building process

Re: [PATCH 4/4] SPARC: optimize IRQ enable & disable

On 20/11/14 15:23, Daniel Hellstrom wrote: On 11/20/2014 03:09 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: [...] The image is a boxplot of all the MaxThreadDispatchDisabledTime samples. I think this is a nice utility and you seem to be able to update the results quickly too. Thanks. Since it is the test-sui