Hi
I have a warning for building it. it is defined in three places:
libbsp/arm/nds/start/start.S
libbsp/arm/shared/abort/simple_abort.c
libbsp/arm/shared/abort/abort.c
And invoked from cpukit/score/cpu/arm/arm_exc_handler_low.S
Should this be renamed to arm_do_data_abort() and prototyped
in rt
On 10/14/2014 3:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 14/10/2014 11:24 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> On October 14, 2014 1:29:50 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber
>> wrote:
>>> On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill
On 14/10/2014 11:24 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On October 14, 2014 1:29:50 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
NOTE: For defaults for weak symbols, I am just addin
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
NOTE: For defaults for weak symbols, I am just adding
a prototype to the C f
>From 1ca653a9310b1e7e44fd1ac672fd8ca12d1c10db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Moroz.Oleg"
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:29:51 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] Adding support for stm32f407
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/stm32f4/Makefile.am | 2 +-
.../libbsp/arm/stm32f4/make/custom/stm32f407.cfg | 7
On 14/10/14 14:25, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On October 14, 2014 1:26:00 AM CDT, Sebastian
Huber wrote:
>On 13/10/14 18:33, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>Is this fixed once we get to tools with your new long long checking
>>in newlib?
>
>No, this is a bug for all 32-bit targets with uintptr_t !=
>
>un
On October 14, 2014 1:26:00 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>On 13/10/14 18:33, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Is this fixed once we get to tools with your new long long checking
>> in newlib?
>
>No, this is a bug for all 32-bit targets with uintptr_t !=
>
>unsigned int.
I submitted a patch for that
On October 14, 2014 1:29:50 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
NOTE: For defaults for weak symbols, I am just adding
a prototype to the C file.
>>
arm-rtems4.11-readelf -l shell.exe
Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file)
Entry point 0x8000189
There are 4 program headers, starting at offset 52
Program Headers:
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
EXIDX 0x027aa0 0x080279e8 0x080279e8 0x8 0x
On 14/10/14 12:07, Мороз Олег wrote:
Hello everyone. I'm trying to start RTEMS on STM32F407. It has only 192KB of
Ram. After compile a test program i' executing arm-rtems4.11-size
arm-rtems4.11-size shell.exe
text databssdechexfilename
162292 1576
Hello everyone. I'm trying to start RTEMS on STM32F407. It has only
192KB of Ram. After compile a test program i' executing arm-rtems4.11-size
arm-rtems4.11-size shell.exe
text databssdechexfilename
162292 1576 195016 358884 579e4shell
11 matches
Mail list logo