On 10/14/2014 3:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 14/10/2014 11:24 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> On October 14, 2014 1:29:50 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber >> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >>> On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>>> On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>> On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>>>>> NOTE: For defaults for weak symbols, I am just adding >>>>>> a prototype to the C file. >>>>> How do you then ensure that a non-weak implementation has the same >>>>> signature? >>>>> >>>> Don't ask me. I didn't add any of these weak symbol options to any >>> BSP. >>>> I am only fixing warnings on existing code. :) >>> Adding a prototype for a global function to the C file doesn't fix the >>> warning. >>> It just silences the warning and obscures things. >> Every case I have seen so far is for bsp_start() to have a weak default >> version. There is a prototype for that in BSP/bootcard.h and the default >> version can be static. >> >> I have started making the week default static. I will sweep to ensure they >> all are but if someone beats me to it, I won't complain. >> > Weak and static ? If so it does not make any sense to me. The public "proper" name has to be not-static but the default can be static. > Chris
-- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
