On 14/10/2014 11:24 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On October 14, 2014 1:29:50 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
NOTE: For defaults for weak symbols, I am just adding
a prototype to the C file.
How do you then ensure that a non-weak implementation has the same
signature?
Don't ask me. I didn't add any of these weak symbol options to any
BSP.
I am only fixing warnings on existing code. :)
Adding a prototype for a global function to the C file doesn't fix the
warning.
It just silences the warning and obscures things.
Every case I have seen so far is for bsp_start() to have a weak default
version. There is a prototype for that in BSP/bootcard.h and the default
version can be static.
I have started making the week default static. I will sweep to ensure they all
are but if someone beats me to it, I won't complain.
Weak and static ? If so it does not make any sense to me.
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
