Mhhh...where are status meetings concerning NSS etc. published? I think
it used to be announced on this list in the past...
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote, On 2007-11-16 08:35:
>
>> Nelson Bolyard wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect (and speculate here) that this is because code signin
Gervase Markham wrote, On 2007-11-16 08:35:
> Nelson Bolyard wrote:
>> I suspect (and speculate here) that this is because code signing just
>> isn't very important to Mozilla.
>
> I think it may (also) be true that all of the Mozilla people subscribed
> either do not know very much about code s
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> The CA/Browser Forum (a.k.a. CABForum), the same people who devised EV
> certificates for SSL/TLS servers, are now working on defining EV for
> code signing.
{As Gerv put it, this is Frank, getting touch...)
> So, my questions are:
> - Can we get Mozilla's representatives
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> I suspect (and speculate here) that this is because code signing just
> isn't very important to Mozilla.
I think it may (also) be true that all of the Mozilla people subscribed
either do not know very much about code signing (me, for one) or don't
feel empowered to speak
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> The CA/Browser Forum (a.k.a. CABForum), the same people who devised EV
> certificates for SSL/TLS servers, are now working on defining EV for
> code signing. They're really working on defining code signing, what it
> means, how it works, etc. They're addressing such fundam
The CA/Browser Forum (a.k.a. CABForum), the same people who devised EV
certificates for SSL/TLS servers, are now working on defining EV for
code signing. They're really working on defining code signing, what it
means, how it works, etc. They're addressing such fundamental issues
as whether signat
6 matches
Mail list logo
