Gervase Markham wrote, On 2007-11-16 08:35: > Nelson Bolyard wrote: >> I suspect (and speculate here) that this is because code signing just >> isn't very important to Mozilla. > > I think it may (also) be true that all of the Mozilla people subscribed > either do not know very much about code signing (me, for one) or don't > feel empowered to speak (you?) or both. > >> So, my questions are: >> - Can we get Mozilla's representatives to CABForum to play a more >> active role in the definition of EV code signing? >> - Failing that, can we get them to delegate that duty to us NSS >> developers (as they did for some time in the past)? >> - Failing either of those, do we NSS developers WANT to play a more >> active role in the definition of EV code signing? > > Thank you for raising this issue. We discussed this in the MoFo status > call today; Frank should be in touch.
Still waiting to hear about the outcome of that discussion. /Nelson _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
