Nelson Bolyard wrote: > I suspect (and speculate here) that this is because code signing just > isn't very important to Mozilla.
I think it may (also) be true that all of the Mozilla people subscribed either do not know very much about code signing (me, for one) or don't feel empowered to speak (you?) or both. > So, my questions are: > - Can we get Mozilla's representatives to CABForum to play a more > active role in the definition of EV code signing? > - Failing that, can we get them to delegate that duty to us NSS > developers (as they did for some time in the past)? > - Failing either of those, do we NSS developers WANT to play a more > active role in the definition of EV code signing? Thank you for raising this issue. We discussed this in the MoFo status call today; Frank should be in touch. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
