Daniel Dreymann wrote, On 2007-12-15 23:52:
> On Dec 15, 11:01 pm, Nelson Bolyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I think not. In a world where non-signed email is discarded, and all
>> spam is signed, the verified sender identity becomes a basis for the
>> user to impose reputation filters of
On 071216 at 01:50, Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> Steffen Schulz wrote, On 2007-12-12 10:34:
> > On 071209 at 03:55, Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> >> If FF doesn't have any built-in UI for SRP, I think I have a harder time
> >> justifying the inclusion of SRP in NSS. I think it's a feature that
> >> would be
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> a) My own extended family. Years ago, I helped each and every one of
> them setup the email clients in their Netscape Communicators to work
> with their ISPs' email accounts. I did this when they transitioned from
> Netscape to Mozilla too. Today, besides me, only two of
Daniel, just a few more...
Daniel Dreymann wrote:
> OK, so we agree that an EV without reputation should NOT provide
> benefits, yes?
"EV" stands for extended validation...if this isn't a benefit than tell
me what is (yes, I know...it's called GoodMail so don't mention that)
> So, we, at Goodmai
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Dreymann wrote:
> On Dec 15, 6:45 pm, "Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Daniel, sorry to be interruptive, but let me clarify this...your system
>> has (almost) nothing to do with identity validation, signing and
>> encryption and is all about fighti
Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote, On 2007-12-15 18:14:
>> It seems that most of the world's email users have moved away from
>> running their own MUA programs to using webmail.
> Oh no...now you have also fallen into this hype?
No hype. I came to this conclusion based on my own direct observa
6 matches
Mail list logo
