would be great! Thanks.
Dirk
Regards,
Boris
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 9:43 PM Dirk Schulze
mailto:dschu...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi Boris,
Blink doesn't support offset-anchor either it seems. Are you keeping it behind
a feature flag as well?
The WebKit bug is here: https://bugs.webkit
Hi Boris,
Did the CSS WG agree to ship the 3 transform functions? CSS Transforms level 2
is a working draft at the moment. It does describe 3D transforms and
corresponding CSS properties as well but they shipped prefixed at a time where
there weren't feature flags. For the 3 properties you prop
Hi Boris,
Blink doesn't support offset-anchor either it seems. Are you keeping it behind
a feature flag as well?
The WebKit bug is here: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203847
At least initially I do not plan to implement offset-anchor either.
The spec currently is a working draft and n
Hi,
I would like to implement the functions as part of the
‘clip-path’ property including the reference boxes. Basic shapes functions are:
circle(), ellipse(), inset() and polygon().
Examples:
clip-path: circle(100px at center); /* draws a circle in the middle of a box */
clip-path: ellipse(c
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 2:44 AM, "L. David Baron" wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 2014-09-16 16:31 -0700, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:44 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>>>
On Tuesday 2014-09-16 21:29 +, Max Vujovic wrote:
== Interop ==
Safari, Chrome, and Opera curren
As of August 29 I intend to turn the CSS mask-type property on by default on
all platforms. It has been developed behind the layout.css.masking.enabled
preference.
The feature implementation was done with the following bug report :
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793617
WebKit an
On Jun 8, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> Note that the current way that isIdentity() works also fails to offer that
> characteristic, outside of accidental cases, due to how floating point
> works.
DOMMatrix focuses on CSS, SVG and HTML which are not limited to value range of
-1 to 1
On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:38 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
> >
> > The issue is not that "isIdentity()" is confusing. The problem is that y
On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
> The issue is not that "isIdentity()" is confusing. The problem is that you
> shouldn't make decisions based on it. From earlier in the thread:
>
> The isIdentity() method has the same issue as was described about is2D()
> above: as matrices
On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:10 PM, Neil wrote:
> Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>> 1. isIdentity()
>> We settled that this should mean that the matrix was never changed to a non
>> identity state.
>>
> Are you doing something similar for the 2d/3d case?
This is already in the specification[1]. As Rik menti
On Jun 6, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Kip Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> From a game programmer's perspective, isIdentity would normally be used to
>> cull out work. In these cases, it is expected that isIdentity will return
>> true only when t
On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:12 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Milan Sreckovic
> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2014, at 18:34 , Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 8:00 AM, "Rik Cabanier"
mailto:caban...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Dirk Schulze
mailto:dschu...@adobe.com>> wrote:
On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:52 AM, Rik Cabanier
mailto:caban...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On T
On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:52 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> > What about
>
On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> What about
>
> DOMMatrix(1,0,0,1,0,0) or
> DOMMatrix(1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1)
>
> Do we check the values and determine if the matrix
On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:28 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> :) would be short enough I guess. But doesn’t sound serious enough.
>
> translateSelf?
>
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yh
On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:52 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
> > It seems like we're getting to agreement. (Please tell me if I'm wrong
> >
On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> It seems like we're getting to agreement. (Please tell me if I'm wrong about
> this)
> There are 2 things that I have questions about:
> 1. isIdentity()
> We settled that this should mean that the matrix was never changed to a non
> identity
On Jun 5, 2014, at 2:47 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-06-04 20:28 GMT-04:00 Cameron McCormack :
> On 05/06/14 07:20, Milan Sreckovic wrote:
> In general, is “this is how it worked with SVGMatrix” one of the
> design principles?
>
> I was hoping this would be the time matrix rotate() m
On Jun 5, 2014, at 2:28 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On 05/06/14 07:20, Milan Sreckovic wrote:
>> In general, is “this is how it worked with SVGMatrix” one of the
>> design principles?
>>
>> I was hoping this would be the time matrix rotate() method goes to
>> radians, like the canvas rotate,
On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:42 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> That would require try/catch around all the "invert()" calls. This is ugly
> but more importantly, it will significan
On Jun 2, 2014, at 12:11 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> Objection #6:
>
> The determinant() method, being in this API the only easy way to get
> something that looks roughly like a measure of invertibility, will probably
> be (mis-)used as a measure of invertibility. So I'm quite confident that it
>
On May 12, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:22 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/Style/2013/css-charter.html
>
> Can we expect CSS to move to asynchronous decision making as practiced
> in e.g. WebApps at some point? The idea one has to atten
Hi Anne,
On Mar 25, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>> It's defined as the "Path" object in the WhatWG spec [1] but after a long
>> discussion and author feedback that name was considered too generic and
>> renamed.
>
> Pointer?
24 matches
Mail list logo
