On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:28 AM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschu...@adobe.com> wrote:
> :) would be short enough I guess. But doesn’t sound serious enough.
>
> translateSelf?
>
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le
> atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp
> waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:28 AM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschu...@adobe.com> wrote:
> :) would be short enough I guess. But doesn’t sound serious enough.
>
> translateSelf?
On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org>
> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschu...@adobe.com> wrote:
> :) would be short enough I guess. But doesn’t sound serious enough.
>
> translateSelf?
>
> Or translateThis of course.
Do you mean transform instead of translate? After all, the proposal seems to be
that we check all functions if they modify the matrix or not?
Beside the name, there seems to be another open question. The default
constructor
DOMMatrix();
is identity and we can flag it as that. What about
DOMMatrix(1,0,0,1,0,0) or
DOMMatrix(1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,1)
Do we check the values and determine if the matrix is identity or not? If we
do, then authors could write DOMMatrix(other.a, other.b, other.c, other.d,
other.e, other.f) and check any kind of matrix after transforming for identity.
In this case, a real isIdentity check wouldn’t be worst IMO.
Greetings,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
