On Thursday 2014-05-08 18:48 -0400, Vladan Djeric wrote:
> Why didn't TP5 report a regression in memory usage?
Perhaps because of what this bit of the original message describes:
> On 05/05/2014 8:14 PM, Jason Duell wrote:
> >On 04/30/2014 11:23 PM, Jason Duell wrote:
> >>Note: like last time, ca
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Vladan Djeric wrote:
> Why didn't TP5 report a regression in memory usage?
Because TP5's memory measurements are meagre and usually fail to
detect even obvious regressions. And this leak only occurred in
unusual circumstances; AWSY is much better than TP5 at detect
I'm curious how much of that 1% is on old versions of Firefox and
aren't updating anyway?
/ Jonas
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2012 4:37:53 PM UTC-8, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>> 2012/1/3 Jeff Muizelaar :
>>
>> >
>>
>> > On 2012-01-03, at 2:01 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote
Wonderful, thanks Matthew!
@Stability-team: ^^^ see the value of public crashdata CSV files in action!
Thanks!
Benoit
2014-05-08 20:42 GMT-04:00 :
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2012 4:37:53 PM UTC-8, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> > 2012/1/3 Jeff Muizelaar :
> >
> > >
> >
> > > On 2012-01-03, at 2:01 PM, Be
I'd really like to see the CSS WG spend some time on properties that
allowed more control over scrolling and zooming. Also something that
addresses the complexity involved in building "long scrollable lists".
Right now a lot of websites implement their own scrolling behavior in
JS by listening to
On Tuesday, January 3, 2012 4:37:53 PM UTC-8, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> 2012/1/3 Jeff Muizelaar :
>
> >
>
> > On 2012-01-03, at 2:01 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>
> >
>
> > 2012/1/2 Robert Kaiser :
>
> >
>
> > Jean-Marc Desperrier schrieb:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > According to https://bugzilla.mozilla.or
W3C recently published the following proposal to revise the W3C
process, which is effectively in the "Proposed Recommendation" stage
right now:
http://www.w3.org/2014/05/Process-20140506/
The document contains a description of the major changes in the
"Status of this Document" section.
The most
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Working Group
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014May/.html
http://www.w3.org/Style/2013/css-charter.html
deadline for comments: May 29
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objectio
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2014-05-08, 8:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Benoit Jacob
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> WebGL is low-level and generalistic enough that it is not specifically a
>>> "3d" graphics API. I prefer to call it a low-l
Why didn't TP5 report a regression in memory usage?
On 05/05/2014 8:14 PM, Jason Duell wrote:
Our trial run of the HTTP cache v2 is done and we will be back to using
the old cache as of tonight's nightly. We found one very important bug
that didn't show up in automated tests, which is great.
J
On 07/05/2014 9:51 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
I would like to retire some telemetry probes in Firefox 32, but at the
same time, I would like the Telemetry Dashboard to keep reporting data
for those probes throughout the lifetime of Thunderbird 31 ESR. To
make sure that the probes don't disappear fr
I've recently fought my way through a bunch of intermittent test
failures in the Add-on Manager mochitest-browser suite, and there's a
common anti-pattern where tests receive a Window callback, usually
"unload", and proceed to do significant work inside that event handler
(e.g. opening/closing/focu
On 2014-05-08, 8:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
WebGL is low-level and generalistic enough that it is not specifically a
"3d" graphics API. I prefer to call it a low-level or generalistic graphics
API.
Fair, forgot about that argument. "we
Diagnosing bug 1006075 led me to believe that our mochitest-browser
framework instantiates and runs the update-timer service
(http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/update/nsIUpdateTimerManager.idl,
http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/mozapps/update/nsUpdate
On 2014-05-08, 5:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
The "Implementations are free to return a context that implements a higher
version" part violates the above requirement 1. in your email, "The WebGL
working group wants web pages to opt in to th
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 5:25:49 AM UTC-4, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Making the Web little-endian may indeed have been the right thing.
> Still, at least from the outside, it looks like the WebGL group didn't
> make an intentional wise decision to make the Web little-endian but
> instead made a naive
> I think what we should do is confirm that strict warnings as errors is
> actually turned on for xpcshell, and if so, where this happens.
Indeed. Can you set a breakpoint in toggleWerror and see what trips it?
Gavin
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Eddy Bruel wrote:
> To be clear, I don't actua
To be clear, I don't actually know where the werror flag for xpcshell
tests is set.
What I've observed is:
-If we Cu.import a JSM that requires module X, and then also require
module X from head_dbg.js after that, all is well.
-If we require module X from head_dbg.js first, and then als
On 08/05/14 12:56, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> (*plug*) this might be useful reading:
> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/04/the-concepts-of-webgl/
Comedy. I just read that article, and thought "this article is awesomely
useful." I then looked at the comments, and it turned out that the first
comment is fr
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> WebGL is low-level and generalistic enough that it is not specifically a
> "3d" graphics API. I prefer to call it a low-level or generalistic graphics
> API.
Fair, forgot about that argument. "webgles" or some such might be
better then. Or en
2014-05-08 5:53 GMT-04:00 Anne van Kesteren :
> It seems like you want to be able to do that going forward so you
> don't have to maintain a large matrix forever, but at some point say
> you drop the idea that people will want 1 and simply return N if they
> ask for 1.
Yes, that's what we agreed
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> We had a meeting about this today, and there is one big issue with my
> proposal above. Because of the fact that extra dictionary members in the
> contextOptions arguments are ignored, this means that UA engines which have
> already shipped t
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> The "Implementations are free to return a context that implements a higher
> version" part violates the above requirement 1. in your email, "The WebGL
> working group wants web pages to opt in to the WebGL2 specific parts of the
> functionality
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 9:30:27 AM UTC-4, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
>>
>> In general, I'm worried about groups that are rather isolated and that
>> have non-Web background members making decisions that go against the
>> Web wisdom gained f
webglex (to avoid the number) and make the version: N check mandatory for that?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
25 matches
Mail list logo
