LGTM. I don't have any other comments.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/52#issuecomment-1022872136
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Thank you @cbalint13 for your kind response! We are super excited to hear about
your work and more than happy to assist/collaborate on TensorIR/MetaSchedule!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8473#issuecomment-1022778418
You are receiving
Also see discussion in the pre-RFC:
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-ci-skip-slow-tests-on-prs/11910
@areusch @Mousius
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/55
-- Commit Summary --
* @slow test RFC
-- File Changes --
I'll merge this week unless there is a further comment cc @FrozenGene
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/52#issuecomment-1022729855
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@areusch: Forgot to answer your first question.
Yes, for now, we like to generate external JSON files, only for the accelerator
sub graph(s), in the BuildResult step so that we can pass them to our
not-(yet-)in-TVM-general-flow, external-accelerator-specific compiler backend
program to do furthe
> Hey @cbalint13 thanks for asking! Absolutely!
>
@junrushao1994
First, thanks a lot for your time !
- I am very happy even just to witness what is going on recently in TVM (on
mind blowing pace).
> > Was Auto Tensorization removed form this list (was at section [M4b] if I
> > recall), what
Hey @cbalint13 thanks for asking! Absolutely!
> Was Auto Tensorization removed form this list (was at section [M4b] if I
> recall), what was/is the plan with ?
The only reason is that I'm trying to organize the roadmap. Auto tensorization
is a huge item and we want to have a separate tracking i
@areusch: Thanks again for your latest responses. Don't worry about timing (we
all have our real jobs to do too).
I am going to update the RFC #48 doc based on many of your feedback in the next
few days -- including to add figures by following the example you gave and to
add descriptions to clar
@junrushao1994 ,
In looking tracking for auto-tensorization ability of TVM (to explore search
for accelerators designs & custom ISA) permit me to ask:
* Was ```Auto Tensorization``` removed form this list (was at section [M4b] if
I recall), what was/is the plan with ?
* Wanted to also ask if it
