Hey @cbalint13 thanks for asking! Absolutely! > Was Auto Tensorization removed form this list (was at section [M4b] if I > recall), what was/is the plan with ?
The only reason is that I'm trying to organize the roadmap. Auto tensorization is a huge item and we want to have a separate tracking issue for it. As you already see, we have been upstreaming auto tensorization-related PRs, including #9871 #10066. [My branch](https://github.com/junrushao1994/tvm/tree/meta-schedule) also contains auto tensorization-related working examples if you want to try them out now :-) > Also regarding of design plan, will/have something in common with principles > of https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08458? This work is done by my fellow colleagues, and of course we are aware, and we have a lot in common :-) Their codebase is public [here](https://github.com/were/unit). The difference here is that we are now using TensorIR, a more powerful and systematic IR/scheduling system to support tensorization -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8473#issuecomment-1022495276 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm/issues/8473/1022495...@github.com>
