@areusch: Thanks again for your latest responses. Don't worry about timing (we all have our real jobs to do too). I am going to update the RFC #48 doc based on many of your feedback in the next few days -- including to add figures by following the example you gave and to add descriptions to clarify many good questions of reviewers. Once that is done, we will reply to your latest responses individually. For changing the en_id name to exprnode_id, we will update our POC-up-streamed TVM PR accordingly first. Btw, in our RFC flow, we mentioned that we need to call the relay defused-op pass convert merge-composition-ed Relay IR back to w/o-composition Relay IR. We found a bug in the Relay Defuses-op pass and had up-streamed a fix and a test case to TVM (see TVM PR-10069 for details).
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/48#issuecomment-1022454837 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/48/c1022454...@github.com>
