lt value in o.a.juli.FileHandler to disable buffering.
I am ok with any of a) and b). Any thoughts?
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
connect upon transmission failure
> + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=898906&view=rev
> + +1: fhanik
> + -1:
> +
Just wondering:
1. If any destination fails, you will disconnect the whole sender?
2. Shouldn't disconnect() call
2010/1/13 Mark Thomas :
> On 13/01/2010 16:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> There is Mark's patch for that (r898468), but I have doubts
>> regarding Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(new Cleaner());
>> used there.
>
> Why? It is pretty much identical to the
intenance
for these files.
Content of the files is mostly version-specific. E.g. TC 6 requires
JRE 5, but TC 7 JRE 6, TC 6 implements Servlets 2.5, TC 7 Servlets
3.0, etc.
> * Download a source package from:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/downl
2010/1/14 :
> Author: markt
> Date: Thu Jan 14 19:48:41 2010
> New Revision: 899380
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899380&view=rev
> Log:
> Skipping installer shouldn't break package-winzip target
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/dist.xml
>
I think that all content of the new "win-prepa
2010/1/17 :
> Author: markt
> Date: Sun Jan 17 12:43:34 2010
> New Revision: 900130
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=900130&view=rev
> Log:
> Vote
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
>
> * Allow compliance with SRV.15.2.22.1 to be controlled separately
> from STRICT_SERV
;t maintain changelog-1.1.x.html [2] in the trunk,
because it duplicates effort.
I'll update the link on the main site. Be sure to use the right link
in the announcement.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To uns
2010/1/19 Rainer Jung :
> On 19.01.2010 01:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/ generated from /native/trunk,
>> or from /native/branches/1.1.x/ ?
>>
>> Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
&g
ni.Socket.accept
I think it is a minor issue, because it only happens on shutdown. I'll
file a Bugzilla issue with more details.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
2010/1/20 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/1/19 jean-frederic clere :
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/
>>
>>
>
> Tested
> apache-tomcat-6.0.24.exe
> apache-tomcat-6.0.24-windows-x86.zip
&g
ur work on this.
>
> Mark
>
> PS Don't forget the (relatively) new announce@ list.
>
Congratulations!
Note, that we now have 4 zip binaries: a generic one, and three
bundled with Windows binaries for different CPU architectures.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
--
rchives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-announce/
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
2010/1/21 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/1/21 Mark Thomas :
>> On 21/01/2010 04:33, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have 6 binding Stable votes.
>>> I'll proceed with copying the files to
>>> dist, updating the web pages and m
this to 6.0 and 5.5 docs. Are there any complaints?
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
i tried putting jsp-api.jar into the /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_16/jre/lib/ext.
Please, do not forget to remove it from there.
> But in vain.
> false is there into web.xml. What is the problem, can
> someone please explain me about this? Do i have to download tomcat again? Do
> you t
t-juli.jar in extras, but that is
"other" JULI, used to run Tomcat with Log4J. (62759 bytes jar vs.
25804 bytes jar in 6.0.24). Is this intended?
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
deferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral options all
along with unescaped expressions until evaluation time?
Lastly,
when Mark was testing TC7 with JSP 2.2 TCK, he caught several minor EL
evaluation issues. Those are fixed in TC7, and I think some of them
have to be backported to TC6. Though, I have not reviewed them in
detail yet. For reference, here are those revision numbers:
899635 <- I've already proposed this one for backport
899653
899769
899770
899783
899788
899792
899916
899918
899919
899935
899949
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
I do not mind, as far as it works. I am just curious.
I thought that was to be able to separate o.a.t.jni.* into separate
jar, and to be able to run AprLifecycleListener even if that jar is
not available.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---
I saw that you reverted 804734 in TC6 (rev. 905015), so
probably only the second one is needed here, (and to add 905015 to
TC6 proposal?)
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
2010/1/31 Mark Thomas :
> On 30/01/2010 17:41, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 30/01/2010 07:33, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> Regarding the implementation, AttributeParser.java class. I think
>>> that, based on the above, we can fix it to solve bug 48627. Other
>>>
2010/2/1 Mark Thomas :
> On 01/02/2010 02:04, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/2/1 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Mon Feb 1 00:08:07 2010
>>> New Revision: 905147
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=905147&view=rev
>>>
Also, it would be better to do the same for trunk and 6.0 as well.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
+ return;
> }
>
It should be
if (started) {
if(log.isInfoEnabled()) {
log.info(sm.getString("standardService.start.started"));
}
return;
}
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
2010/2/2 Mark Thomas :
> On 02/02/2010 17:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/2/2 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Tue Feb 2 17:10:05 2010
>>> New Revision: 905710
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=905710&view=rev
>>&
2010/2/2 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/2/2 Mark Thomas :
>> On 02/02/2010 17:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2010/2/2 :
>>>> Author: markt
>>>> Date: Tue Feb 2 17:10:05 2010
>>>> New Revision: 905710
>>>>
>>>>
s.sourceforge.net/
It can be unpacked by certain archivers (e.g. by 7-zip that I am using).
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
e expandable repository.
>
I do not see /repos/dist/
svn.apache.org, dist.apache.org give 404 for that address.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
ied.
The build procedure for Tomcat 6 remains the same.
Thank you for your work on this.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
le and I'll get on
> with it?
>
> Probably the contents of output/release ? or just the contents of
> output/release/v7.0.0-dev/src/ ?
>
I think it is output/release
Both the binaries and the sources are needed.
> What else?
>
&
2010/2/8 :
> Author: markt
> Date: Mon Feb 8 02:00:58 2010
> New Revision: 907538
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=907538&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
> Don't look for EL matches (which swallow the EL match string) if EL is not
> enabled
ava/tomcat-native-1.1.19 creation was not successful for
an unknown reason
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
pse/downloads/drops/R-3.5.1-200909170800/ecj-3.5.1.jar
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
2010/2/9 Mark Thomas :
> On 09/02/2010 13:05, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> Looking at
>> http://archive.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.4.2-200902111700/
>> there exist a download "JDT Core Batch Compiler"
>>
>> The ecj-3.4.2.jar downloaded fro
nk", where this change is not implemented yet.
The "tomcat-6-trunk" buildbot apparently has the same value of
"base.path" as the "tomcat-trunk" one. That is, it reuses libraries
downloaded by "tomcat-trunk" on its previous run. Thus it was more
rare to see errors coming from it.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
is change now there is no information about what TC release
includes the workaround. It requires some experience to derive that
from revision numbers. Though everyone can look in the changelog.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
actly where the
JspLoader was created.
Some search shows that JspCompilationContext.compile() sets
JspCompilationContext.jspLoader to null. Maybe that will result in a
leak when recompiling updated JSP.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
just do the assignment. Quotes are needed. 2) %my.jmx.port% will
be ${my.jmx.port}
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
the tomcat-5.5-doc symlink.
It is owned by your private group (markt) right now.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
2010/2/13 :
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Sat Feb 13 00:51:47 2010
> New Revision: 909673
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=909673&view=rev
> Log:
> fix compilation error
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Connector.java
>
What is this? The new code is equivale
the case in all places - see BZ 48625 and its fix (r752323)
Though that might have been an occasional error - I have not searched
all places.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apa
6.0 and 5.5 variations of the patch will be prepared soon.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
that JspFragment to appear. Once we
try to nest a classic tag in it, it fails.
In r910395.I added a test that demonstrates that. The alternative patch,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616#c20
does work here.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---
nts
> +
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2010-02-16-manifest-improvements.patch
> + +1: markt
> + -1:
Looks good, though I have to test it yet.
I see that it includes rev.905360 that was already proposed to TC.6.
You may revoke that old proposal as th
2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/2/16 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010
>> New Revision: 910644
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910644&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Proposal
>>
>> Modified:
>>
2010/2/17 Mark Thomas :
> On 16/02/2010 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/2/16 Konstantin Kolinko :
>>> 2010/2/16 :
>>>> Author: markt
>>>> Date: Tue Feb 16 18:39:08 2010
>>>> New Revision: 910644
>>>>
>>>>
ng were saying that the checksums are wrong without that change.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Check what version of Servlet specification your web.xml adheres to.
See examples webapp that comes with Tomcat for an example.
http://faq.javaranch.com/java/ElOrJstlNotWorkingAsExpected
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To un
also had "6.0.0.0" in their server.number. In 6.0.20 it
was "6.0.20.0" as it should be.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
2010/2/26 :
> Author: mturk
> Date: Fri Feb 26 06:47:19 2010
> New Revision: 916587
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916587&view=rev
> Log:
> Add Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29 release
>
> +
> +
> +The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.2.29
> of
> +Apache Tom
2010/2/27 :
> Author: mturk
> Date: Sat Feb 27 10:16:14 2010
> New Revision: 916938
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916938&view=rev
> Log:
> Revert withdrawal notice. Seems this requires a vote
>
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
Best
quot;#{") are called regardless of
whether pageInfo.isELIgnored() or
pageInfo.isDeferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral() are true. I consider it a
rare case though.
I planned to look at BZ 48668 first. In any case, that I won't be able
to do that earlier than in 8 hours
ent can be sent faster than any testing for RC can be done. I
do not expect 1.2.30 release earlier than in next 40 hours (let me be
wrong). It can save some people a day.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe,
2010/2/27 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/2/24 jean-frederic clere :
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
>> [x] Broken
>
> https://iss
2010/3/2 :
> Author: mturk
> Date: Tue Mar 2 09:14:44 2010
> New Revision: 917928
>
> + public void seSSLInsecureRenegotiation(boolean SSLInsecureRenegotiation)
> {
There is a misprint above: s/seSSL/setSSL/
Best regards,
2010/3/2 :
> Author: markt
> Date: Tue Mar 2 16:02:25 2010
> New Revision: 918093
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=918093&view=rev
> Log:
> Better fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
> As per Konstantin's comments, ensure a single Vary header is used and take
ngs.
>
It just happens. I am sure that I myself will forget to set those
properties sometime. It is good that your computer is up and running.
Happy coding!
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
/LifecycleState.java
- do not have svn:eol-style.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
r message you were getting we'd
> be able to provide more specific advice.
Note, that you can use build/build.properties file to redefine the
download URLs.
Please let us know if some of them are not working.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
--
re write lock is
released on an error condition")
Mark,
on error condition we should release all locks and quit the method
(there is only one lock there: write lock).
We should not obtain the read lock after an error in that try{} block.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
There were no changes at all, as it is all English, but the patch
replaces all lines of it.
Just checked the file - and it does not have svn:eol-style property set.
I think that you can fix the property and remove that file from the patch.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
il/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/JSSE13SocketFactory.java
>> + 2)
>> +
>> http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/patches/2010-03-06_tc55_remove_JSSE13Factory.patch
>> + +1: kkolinko
>> + -1:
>
> Unless I am missing something, you can also remove the whole
eb.xml
>> parse/merge changes for Tomcat 7. I'll get those fixed and see what
>> impact that has.
>
> That has fixed one set of failures but some failures remain and they
> look to be related to the isDeferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiter
ot;modern" compiler and initialize a wrapper around
it, but cannot.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
f deferred EL syntax is treated as EL or as
>> a literal
Ah, I see. That is said in the chapter "Backwards Compatibility with
JSP 2.0" that precedes the main spec pages (page xxiv in JSP 2.2
Specification).
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
2010/3/7 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/3/7 Mark Thomas :
>> On 07/03/2010 18:45, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Sun Mar 7 18:45:50 2010
>>> New Revision: 920055
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920055&view=r
2010/3/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 07/03/2010 21:26, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/3/7 Konstantin Kolinko :
>>> 2010/3/7 Mark Thomas :
>>>> On 07/03/2010 18:45, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>> Author: markt
>>>>> Date: Sun Mar 7 18
n Monday...
>>
>> Though so :)
>>
>> Konstantin's improved fixes for 48668 need one more vote and then I
>> think we'll be good to go.
>
> hm the 3 patches go very well togother. Won't
ISO-8859-1, some in Windows-1252, some in
UTF-8. There should have been some reason why that happened.
That said, I am +1 for C-T-R for any translation fixes.
6. Should we mark C-T-R commits somehow in the commit message?
E.g. writing "C-T-R" or "tr
I propose to relax our RTC policy and use CTR for the types of changes
listed below:
2010/3/8 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 1. We already have Commit-Then-Review for any documentation, including
> JavaDoc and code comments.
>
Already decided. No need to vote.
> 2. I think that we can ha
2010/3/8 Mladen Turk :
> On 03/08/2010 08:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> Allow C-T-R for changes to svn properties:
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] 0
>> [X] -1
>>
>
> -1 because it can mean anything and nothing.
> Changing line endings, executable flag, mime type
2010/3/8 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/3/8 Mark Thomas :
>> On 07/03/2010 21:26, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>
>>> Re: r920110:
>>> (...)
>>> I see no provision in the spec for the above change.
>>>
>>> The chapter "Backwards Compa
Do not forget to update both
version.minor
version.suffix
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
of the
"tag invocation will give the name of the variable."
So the attribute value must be known at translation time.
Cannot verify that without some testing, though.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
2010/3/9 Konstantin Kolinko :
> Do not forget to update both
> version.minor
> version.suffix
I meant
version.build
version.suffix
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apach
2010/3/9 jean-frederic clere :
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.26/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.26 tag is:
> [x] Stable
>
Best regards,
It must be
CALL e:\ant\bin\ant.bat all -logger
org.apache.tools.ant.listener.MailLogger (...)
Please read
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
and ask such questions on the users@ list.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@to
about the US mirror. It is the only one that we have
now: the EU mirror is out of service for the last four days.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands
loadedClass" in findClassInternal():
- The loadedClass field would need to be volatile to avoid broken
double-checked locking pattern here, but the change that I am
proposing also fixes it.
Any comments?
[1] http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html
security
issues.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
2010/3/12 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/3/12 :
>> Author: kkolinko
>> Date: Fri Mar 12 15:41:55 2010
>> New Revision: 922300
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=922300&view=rev
>> Log:
>> proposal
>>
>
> My concern, leading to th
e.
Some other thought:
The Subversion project was recently choosing what Bug tracking system
they will be using at Apache, when migrating from Tigris. They choose
Bugzilla, not JIRA:
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415808
Best regards,
Tim
RESULT: Passes
I did not count the votes by Henri Gomez (probably +1 to 2.,3.,4.,5.)
and by Jean-Frederic Clere (looks like -0 to all),
as those were not clear to me.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
that my proposal for this issue is already there, since 2010-03-11.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Your question is off-topic here. Usage questions should be send to the
tomcat-users list.
Please read:
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Do not forget to provide all relevant information. That includes the
*text* of any error messages that you
2010/3/18 Ruslan Gainutdinov :
> Please review this patch for inclusion in trunk.
Your attachment is lost.
Please create a Bugzilla entry for Tomcat 7 and attach it there,
though I cannot comment on whether it will be applied or not.
Best regards,
Konstantin Koli
null)
> + int j = (instances.length -1) -i;
> + if (instances[j] == null)
> continue;
(...)
There is a more easy way to write the same loop:
for (int i = instances.length; (--i) >= 0; ) {
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
--
ile
> qualifier, and add a synchronised getter.
>
A synchronized getter is what we surely do not need here. We can go
back to the separate read and write locks though.
We need volatile so that the current value of 'maxActive' were
consistent between threads. Even the write lock may look a bit
excessive. But - why not?
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
JRE 7.0 support is an enhancement and can be considered separately.
I will attach my old patch to BZ 48903 for future reference.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
d thread pool.
> */
>
The above commit of AbstractEndpoint.java probably was not part of
the async work.
The above new property is not used anywhere, so it is useless as it is.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
background when I zoom-out the page in the browser.
Should check how it looks when actually running the installer, though.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additiona
y be volatile.
>
Startup is performed by a single thread, and it will set the value of
this field.
According to the memory model all the threads started after that will
see the assigned value.
I do not remember any of the "option value" fields in Tomca
2010/3/31 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists :
> On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Keiichi
> Fujino (kfujino) has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
>
Welcome!
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---
2010/4/5 Felix Kurth :
> one last thing: is there A website where i can easily browse this
> mailinglist?
The ones that we know about are mentioned on the following page:
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
Best regards,
Konstantin K
found" may annoy someone, but it does not impact functionality.
The patch is already in STATUS for some time, but needs a third vote.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apa
cle
runs, if it is enabled, but there are also explicit calls from the
manager web application that must not be broken.
The above is from my mind/memory. I have not researched it for this case.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To u
uot; and "insecure
random" at runtime.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
y one such well-known library,
http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
commit message says among other things
"- Add manager base class ClusterManagerBase"
but none classes were added in that revision.
If it will not be fixed shortly, please raise a bug.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
t; Struts 2.1 uses servlet filters as controllers and we can not get
> request dispatcher for filters.
Filters can be called for forwarded and included requests, if you map
them in certain way (something like INCLUDE).
See the Servlet spec for details. SRV.6.2.5
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
just mark it as
deprecated.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
1101 - 1200 of 2494 matches
Mail list logo
