the cookie contains invalid characters
then ->
quote the cookie and set the version to 1
Filip
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:29 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hani
+1
Filip
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
The last 3.x release was almost 4 years ago. Since then there has been
one security patch made available in source form and that was more an
application issue than a Tomcat one.
There is still the odd support question on the users list but I think
it is ti
+1. AnnotationProcessor -> InstanceManager replacement (used by Geronimo)
this is already in trunk, is that what you meant?
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
yes, a the timeframe of 16 months heads up sounds like a good plan.
still many instances of 4 running,
another way to look at it, is to have no more than 3 versions active at
any point, so when TC 7 comes out, TC 4 goes to bed. I think it's too
hard for us to try to maintain more releases than t
According to the release process, the 4.1.37 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Fri Feb 15 08:49:10 2008
New Revision: 628117
* Allow old style cookie values to work(auto switch to v1) (regression)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=627743 (ServerCookie.java)
+1: fhanik, markt
+ +0: remm (the property nam
I just did it today, it's not an automated process, as we can't publish
it until the release has been voted on, and after the release has been
voted through, it's just a matter of someone doing it
Filip
Mohn, Robert wrote:
When will the 6.0.16 release be available in the maven repository? I
n
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 02:40 +, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Fri Feb 15 08:49:10 2008
New Revision: 628117
* Allow old style cookie values to work(auto switch to v1) (regression)
http://svn.apache.org
they're not broken, read the servlet spec
http://marc.info/?t=12025394451&r=1&w=2
Filip
Marcinek, Blazej wrote:
Hi,
I've just tried running Tomcat 5.5.26 and I've noticed a problem with
Cookie handling (though I'm not sure on which side it should be
corrected).
In our application we us
n, my web app
(running on Tomcat) needs to fetch value of this cookie properly to
verify user's authentication - which worked fine till now, but on 5.5.26
the returned cookie value is truncated. Can this be worked around
somehow?
Kind regards,
Blazej Marcinek
-Original Message-
since we have the ability to add bz number to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add svn rev number and
automatically link changes to the actual commit
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add bz number to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add svn rev number
Sure.
and automatically link changes to the actual commit
How?
627743
becomes
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?vie
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add bz number to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add svn rev number
Sure.
and automatically link changes to the actual commit
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3417
(click on "all")
very nice, but we're still on bugzilla (not that we couldn't switch, but
thats not part of this proposal)
Filip
david jencks
- Original Message ----
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: remm
@@ -80,6 +82,7 @@
+1: fhanik, markt
+0: remm (the property name is inconsistent with what has been used
recently, but that
convention was never really discussed either) fhanik: the propperty name
is the same as everywhere else
+ I posted a
an HTTP request, requires an HTTP response, regardless of what the
headers are set to.
proxies and other things that come in the middle would be confused, or
even reject the response if something else came in between.
I'd be surprised if anyone here would be interested in making that
modificatio
please use the tomcat-user list for these kinds of questions.
executor is not a supported attribute for AJP connectors, since it
doesn't make sense to have it
Filip
nitin dubey wrote:
Hi,
I tried configuring executor in tomcat 6.0.14 for AJP Connector like following:
While starting tomca
I've implemented a proper async close
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/patches/comet-async-close.patch
for the NIO connector.
today, when someone calls CometEvent.close() it finishes out the
request, but nothing happens until the connection actually times out,
which could be forever. also, any
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here.
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/
This is what is happening
int cnt=conv.read( result
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch c
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:51 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Test Case and 5.5.x patch c
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 16:04 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
unfortunately, the "elegant" solution caused a regression :(
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44494
I tested this with the inelegant (original propo
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChunk (I suppose the
problem is that realReadChars gets called with len = 0; if it handled
that scenario, things shou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: billbarker
Date: Wed Feb 27 23:44:58 2008
New Revision: 631878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631878&view=rev
Log:
casting vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tom
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
===
---java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java(revision
6
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 18:25 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 17:08 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This makes me think there's a straight issue in CharChu
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector/InputBuffer.java
===
---java/org
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:13 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/connector
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:58 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This problem is a small detail. Much more should be done if you want to
do a refactoring: both the mark functionality and readLine need to have
direct access to the buffer to
Costin Manolache wrote:
On 3/3/08, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:58 -0700, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
This problem is a small detail. Much more should be done if you want
to
do a refactoring
George Sexton wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Requiring any specific order on HTTP response headers is
completely bogus...
:)
To elaborate on why Jim thinks so (and we all agree)...
- it's not spec. You cannot rely on this when authoring a user agent.
- proxies c
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/tomcat/
Henri Gomez wrote:
While looking at
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/maven-jars.html I notice about
that http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/maven-jars.html still
contains 6.0.14 jars.
Will it be updated to
you shouldn't steal threads ;)
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hi,
I thing we must remove 6.0.16 and 5.5.26 from site. The 8 K Post Bug
is a major issue and it must be fixed.
But currently I don't understand the fix alternatives.
Peter
Am 09.03.2008 um 10:23 schrieb Henri Gomez:
While looking at
haven't forgotten about you, it's still on the todo list.
Filip
Jim Manico wrote:
Gentlemen,
I'd like to make a suggestion to add HTTPOnly support to Tomcat 5.5
(for starters). This is a significant security enhancement that will
assist in preventing XSS attacks.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/
actually, IE only supports quoting of the value for v0 cookies.
honestly, I wasn't up for the backwards compatible fix, but since it
turns out that most folks use v0 cookies with v1 values, this is an evil
must.
without the below fix, every single JSESSIONID cookie will not work on IE.
Filip
sounds good to me
Filip
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Please find below a draft of an announcement I intend sending to the
users list later this week. Comments?
Mark
Subject: [ANN] Tomcat support status
All,
We would like to draw your attention to a new Wiki page that provides
detailed infor
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
actually, IE only supports quoting of the value for v0 cookies.
honestly, I wasn't up for the backwards compatible fix, but since it
turns out that most folks use v0 cookies with v1 values, this is an
evil must.
without the below fix,
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
actually, IE only supports quoting of the value for v0 cookies.
honestly, I wasn't up for the backwards compatible fix, but since
it turns out that most folks use v0 cookies with v1 v
this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what it
was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the "value"
of the cookie, but they are not correct for the "path"
the problem is how browsers work (or not work for that matter). for
example, browsers will acce
tomcat doesn't use that spec, we use
http://wp.netscape.com/newsref/std/cookie_spec.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2109.html
not sure how many browsers are actually up to 2965 yet
Filip
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The standard is only 7 1/2 years old;
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965
Jim Ma
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what
it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the
"value" of the cookie, but they are not correct for the "path"
I'm not convince
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what
it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the
"value" of the cookie, but they are not corre
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 15:03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Mar 19 08:03:50 2008
New Revision: 638854
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638854&view=rev
Log:
change a vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 15:03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Mar 19 08:03:50 2008
New Revision: 638854
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638854&view=rev
Log:
change a vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:43 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 : remm, markt
- -1 : fhanik - I tried this patch, and it doesn't work, it hangs. I also saw
the bug report, informing about further issues that are still valid
+ +1 : fhanik - I don't think we should su
when the commons-logging jar files got updated, they also got renamed,
we missed a few spots,
some files in bin and conf still reference the old name, like
catalina.policy
// These permissions apply to the commons-logging API
grant codeBase "file:${catalina.home}/bin/commons-logging-api.jar" {
install the
package.
Costin
On 3/20/08, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
when the commons-logging jar files got updated, they also got renamed,
we missed a few spots,
some files in bin and conf still reference the old name, like
catalina.policy
// These permi
even the 6.0.x needs one more patch in order to be backwards compatible
Filip
Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
One last question Mark...
The tc6.6.x trunk has the patch and it works fine, but not yet the
tc5.5.x.
Is it planned for the next 5.5.x release ?
Olivier Jaquemet wrote:
Thank you for your a
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 18:17 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:43 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 : remm, markt
- -1 : fhanik - I tried this patch, and it doesn't work, it hangs. I also saw
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:25 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
what this filter does, is it relies on the already implemented
BufferedReader, no need to reinvent the wheel.
The java.io.BufferedReader, already has this logic implemented, and it
works, so CoyoteReader
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 14:29 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd prefer to move forward with just the truncation fix so that we can
move towards a release.
Any other efforts can be postponed at this time. If the mark/reset bug
in fact exists, there is an
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 15:19 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
regression, the fact that you can't read more than 8k when using
ServletRequest.getReader
I proposed a patch for that. If it doesn't fix it with the patch I
propos
Jim Manico wrote:
I'm continuing to do a security review of Tomcat 5.5 for my company. I
noticed that linefeeds get ripped out of header values which stops
header injection attacks cold. Whoever did this, I commend you. Many
other containers do not. You Rock.
InternalInputBuffer.java
InternalA
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
What is the goal of tomcat-oacc exactly.
1 - Replace the actual tc-trunk cluster.
No.
2 - Port the tc-5.5.x code and have an alternate cluster.
Yes, reason for alternate see below.
3 - Just a try for the fun.
That wo
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I do not only have these very abstract concerns. There is room for
improvement and I'll happily help as I did in 2004 for the TC 5.0/5.5
cluster. Examples for improvements:
- monitoring (the old MBeans are gone and there's no good alternative)
ClusterJMXHelper.java
ugs that arise from the port itself.
I do have some comments inline too
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I do not only have these very abstract concerns. There is room
for improvement and I'll happily help as I did in 2004 f
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb:
- Java 5 dispatcher: I mostly agree. I got lost in the code. The code
I thought was responsible was transport/PooledSender.java which uses a
fixed pool of threads without queueing. I overlooked somehow the
Executor with queue in
Rainer Jung wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb:
hi Rainer,
so to tell the true tale, isn't the story...
- You got customers on 5.5 using session replication
Of course, and that helped in making the 5.5 cluster better.
- Your customers want to move to Tomcat 6
I do hope so! I th
But what are we talking about:
- "your codebase": its our codebase. If we had to find a single person
for this cluster codebase, then it would be your codebase. As everyone
can see from yesterdays commit, the codebase is nearly identical from
the TC 5.5 codebase. I don't want to have "my" c
jean-frederic clere wrote:
+++ CUT +++
All in all I feel accused by the above formulation.
the answer to this all lies in the fact, that I didn't see an email
on tomcat-dev about OACC creation, so if I missed it, my apologies,
but I cant recall seeing one.
That is in sandbox. sandbox is sup
nice, since we work RTC (Review-Then-Commit) you're gonna have to extend
this invitation to everyone who votes for the patch's inclusion :)
Filip
Jim Manico wrote:
Gentlemen,
As a blatant bribery attempt - I live and work on the island of Kauai
in Hawaii.
Whomever commits this
*https://is
we can't do this one
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21741
that's a servlet spec class
Filip
Jim Manico wrote:
Tequila, tents, food and wireless access provided!!! Tomcat coding
party at Jim's house!
nice, since we work RTC (Review-Then-Commit) you're gonna have to
exte
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
we can't do this one
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21741
that's a servlet spec class
well, that wasnt clever now!
You should first have commited, then made a trip to Kauai with your laptop, and
then from there at the Tomcat co
just taking a quick look at the patch, this is a memory leak.
the buffer will simply grow larger and larger until an OOM happens, if
one keeps marking the buffer
when I am more awake, I'll help out on this, it's very easy to reproduce
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/upload-mark.jsp
Filip
[EMA
ignore my prev email about the mem leak, I wasn't up to current in
trunk, and was running into something else
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Apr 7 15:47:54 2008
New Revision: 645722
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=645722&view=rev
Log:
All of the issues I was see
+1, absolutely, I think the remaining patches, are small and easy and we
can get them in, wanna set a date for the tag
I'll do the same for 5.5 but trail it a couple of days after so we can
get the votes in
If possible, please review
* Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4266
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Did there is plans, ideas or interest around about OSGI-fing Tomcat ?
I've put a note about this a while ago in tomcat/trunk/PROPOSALS.txt
my original plan was just to make sure all the MANIFEST.MF for each file
would have enough in it so that each JAR can be a
Henri Gomez wrote:
2008/4/23 Florent.BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
As part of OW2 JOnAS 5.0 OSGi based application server we're interested to
have Tomcat packaged as an OSGi bundle.
All our modules are bundles and if tomcat is already a bundle we won't have
to wrap it into a bundle
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'm not sure it's the best idea, my goal is to move it out of sandbox,
it already has enough experiments
that need completion. and the main goal is to be 'lite' :-). It has a
simple Addon mechanism, and I don't mind
having an optional addon manager impl using OSGI - but I
like jarjar.
Filip
Of course no commit just testing on my own eclipse/m2 workspace.
2008/4/23 Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'm not sure it's the best idea, my goal is to move it out of sandbox,
it already has enough experiments
that
Henri Gomez wrote:
First define 'mavenizing' please :-)
Yes
If you mean exporting tomcat components in maven repository - fine with me.
It's allready done (by hand) ?
If you mean building tomcat with maven instead of ant - the opposite,
absolutely not fine.
it wa
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'm not sure it's the best idea, my goal is to move it out of sandbox,
it already has enough experiments
that need completion. and the ma
Henri Gomez wrote:
-1 for any change to the build in Tomcat 6.0.
Why ?
simply because it requires changes, I like to think we work according to
"if it aint broke, don't fix it", and since the maven build doesn't give
us anything the ANT build already does, then there seems to be litt
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Filip, this is a fairly rare case where I disagree with you ;)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
simply because it requires changes, I like to think we work according to
It can be done without requiri
Costin Manolache wrote:
We already have eclipse files checked in AFAIK - that counts as the second
build system.
We used to have makefiles too, also in parallel with ant (in 3.0 times).
The goal IMO is that people who like to type mvn can do it - without any
guarantee that
the result will be id
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
We already have eclipse files checked in AFAIK - that counts as the
second
build system.
We used to have makefiles too, also in parallel with a
e have fully recovered
from the last episode yet to the point where we can just CTR anything
and listen to me, I was the one that marked revolutionary :)
Filip
Costin
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Peter Kriens wrote:
I must admit I feel I am walking on eggs ... and I am a bit surprised
how few others tune in.
there is a reason few others turn in, at this point, you have written,
and very well so, about 30 pages of responses.
It's just to hard keep up with long essays like that, not t
ant -f extras.xml downloads and builds this this
filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: costin
Date: Thu May 1 20:18:26 2008
New Revision: 652743
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=652743&view=rev
Log:
Match build.xml - exclude webservices, missing deps
Not sure why it's checked in - if 'd
-1,
this code change here
-log.error("Exception trying to load keystore " +path,ex);
-throw new IOException("Exception trying to load keystore " +
- path + ": " + ex.getMessage() );
+String msg = sm.getString("jsse.keystore_loa
Mark Thomas wrote:
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hi Mark
Java 5 don't support new IOExceptin(String, Throwable)
compile:
[javac] Compiling 49 source files to
/Users/peter/develop/projects/tomcat/tomcat6currenttrunk/output/classes
[javac]
/Users/peter/develop/projects/tomcat/tomcat6currenttru
no, this is my fault
you've updated the link, but left the old votes in there :)
Filip
Mark Thomas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44968
@@ -151,4 +151,4 @@
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=656739&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/vie
I don't see any use case for Comet+sendfile make sense.
but if you do it, you should
...
set your sendfile stuff
call CometEvent.close()
.
ie, the event shouldn't be cometized when doing sendfile, it makes zero
sense since when the file is sent, the HTTP request is over.
Filip
Alex Barc
Alex Barclay wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I don't see any use case for Comet+sendfile make sense.
but if you do it, you should
...
set your sendfile stuff
call CometEvent.close()
.
ie, the event shouldn't be cometized when doing sendfile, it makes
zero sense since whe
removing (or changing signatures) for non-private methods, shouldn't
they be @deprecated for a while?
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 20 15:54:32 2008
New Revision: 658474
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=658474&view=rev
Log:
Fix remainder of https://issues.apa
hi Mike, this question belongs on the user list, I suggest you try there
Filip
Mike wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up connection pooling for Tomcat 5.5 but it
doesn't work. When I start Tomcat, it shows in the Catalina log this:
SEVERE: Exception loading sessions from pe
sandbox better place to play around :) ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 4 15:07:24 2008
New Revision: 663385
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663385&view=rev
Log:
More 1.5 externals
Modified:
tomcat/current/svn15/tc5.5.x/ (props changed)
Propchange: tomcat/cu
oh, maybe I missed the email discussion where we talked about adding
this to svn
if I did, ignore this email
Filip
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
sandbox better place to play around :) ?
I don't see this as playing around. For those of us on this side of
the Atl
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, maybe I missed the email discussion where we talked about adding
this to svn
There wasn't any discussion but what is there to discuss?
I would change the choice of names and the SVN location,
for me looking at svn, I have no idea
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, maybe I missed the email discussion where we talked about adding
this to svn
There wasn't any discussion but what is there to discuss?
I would change the choice of names and the SVN location,
f
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, maybe I missed the email discussion where we talked about
adding this to svn
There wasn't any discussion but what is there to discuss?
I would change the choice of names and th
hi Mark,
can you please update the changelog
thanks
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 13 10:43:51 2008
New Revision: 667604
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667604&view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 45195. NPE when calling getAttribute(null).
The spec is unclear but this is a
Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
hi Mark,
can you please update the changelog
For trunk? The changelog for trunk hasn't been been kept up to date
since it was created.
then we should bring it up to date, and keep it up to date. trunk is no
different in terms of chan
my initial reaction is a -1 to this one
it should be
if ( entry != null && entry.isPrimary() ) set.add(new
MapEntry(key,entry.getValue()));
and not propagate internals of the cluster information out to the caller
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jun 16 10:22:36 2008
Tomcat uses 1.2.2 in that version, so I would suggest not using the
background validation at this point
Filip
Metta wrote:
I'm running TC 6.0.16 on 64Bit RH Linux 5.1
We're seeing a deadlock in the tomcat-dbcp - looks like it's to do with the
abandoned connection checking. I thought 6.0.16 us
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45272
turns out that IE doesn't like
Path="/"
but it does like
Path=/
so, IE, doesn't really do RFC-2109,
I would suggest quoting Path based on tspecials2 minus the "/"
thoughts?
Filip
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45272
turns out that IE doesn't like
Path="/"
but it does like
Path=/
Do you mean that it also doesn't like
Path=/myapp or does it like it?
it likes
Path=/myapp
I have submitted a patch for this to commons
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-270
Filip
Metta wrote:
I'm running TC 6.0.16 on 64Bit RH Linux 5.1
We're seeing a deadlock in the tomcat-dbcp - looks like it's to do with the
abandoned connection checking. I thought 6.0.16 used the commo
here's some history on package etc
http://tomcat.markmail.org/search/?q=InstanceManager
Filip
Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, is there any documentation (or anyone who can explain)
DefaultInstanceManager.processAnnotations() ?
Sorry, I'm a bit confused, lots of calls and structures.
I'm intere
I think this one is missing
Index: dist.xml
===
--- dist.xml(revision 673890)
+++ dist.xml(working copy)
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@
filtering="true" overwrite="true"/>
-
+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1101 - 1200 of 1473 matches
Mail list logo
