https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #17 from agharta 2010-02-15 08:03:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Reviewing the fix to this issue,
> I cannot find any provision in the JSP specification to support the requested
> behaviour.
>
> The question is, when we
Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb 15 08:09:05 2010
New Revision: 910171
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910171&view=rev
Log:
Update to dbcp 1.4 release that supports JDBC4 and compiles on Java 6
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
U
Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb 15 08:09:39 2010
New Revision: 910172
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910172&view=rev
Log:
Spacing
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/build.propertie
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #18 from DSEyers 2010-02-15 08:17:07 UTC ---
The fix/workaround mentioned in this ticket does not work. My last reply was
replying to the comment before that doing checks would be a nightmare (to many
code changes/testing) and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #19 from agharta 2010-02-15 08:25:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> The fix/workaround mentioned in this ticket does not work. My last reply was
> replying to the comment before that doing checks would be a nightmare (to m
On 14/02/2010 06:47, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
> +1. There is a copy-paste issue in the patch:
> + vec.add(tagVarInfos[i]); call was replaced by vec.add(varInfos[i]);
> + which is wrong. This error is not present in trunk.
Fixed.
> +2. isImplemetedAsFragment() method is wrong.
Currently, Lifecycle is an optional interface for components. I'd like
to make it mandatory for Server, Service and Container.
My reasons for this are:
1. Much of the current implementation depends on Lifecycle (e.g. JNDI,
configuration) and breaks if the component doesn't implement Lifecycle
2.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2010-02-15 11:08:19 UTC ---
The default could be made an environment variable rather than hard coding to 5
(simple patch) but this is already configurable. Use:
./catalina.sh stop n
to have Tomcat wait n sec
2010/2/12 Mark Thomas :
> On 12/02/2010 15:20, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> Some times ago, we discuss about mod_jk/cluster and more intelligent
>> strategy to be use for the dispatching system.
>>
>> One point was to get system load informations about the various Tomcat
>> instances invo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #3 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-02-15 11:59:00 UTC ---
My sincere apologies that patch did not make the standard of tomcat community.
I have reformatted the patch and uploading a new one.
To use this the only requirement is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #4 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-02-15 12:01:18 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=24987)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24987)
Updated patch for Spnego support in tomcat
Kindly review and apply.
-
2010/2/15 Mark Thomas :
> Currently, Lifecycle is an optional interface for components. I'd like
> to make it mandatory for Server, Service and Container.
+1, Let's make it mandatory.
I agree with 1.,2.,3. of your reasons.
Cannot comment on 4. as I do not know that subject. Is there any
outline
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48701
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|I
Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb 15 17:14:27 2010
New Revision: 910266
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910266&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48545
Truststores don't have to have passwords
Based on a patch by 'smmwpf54'
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apa
Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb 15 17:16:28 2010
New Revision: 910268
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910268&view=rev
Log:
Proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=910
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48545
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2010-02-15 17:17:34 UTC ---
Thanks for the patch. It has been applied to 7.0.x and proposed for 6.0.x
For future reference, please provide patches in diff -u format as they are
easier to work with. Also, pat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48565
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48565
--- Comment #3 from oscar 2010-02-15 17:36:25 UTC ---
Hi,
In tomcat 5.5 when a member goes down the other node just inform it but it did
not raise a java stack trace.
I think would be better to display a simple message instead of an ugly
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|I
On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Ping. Anyone?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Give me 24hrs... I'll be able to test tomorrow AM.
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
> Ping. Anyone?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> ^TM
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-
+1 works for me
On 02/15/2010 03:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Currently, Lifecycle is an optional interface for components. I'd like
to make it mandatory for Server, Service and Container.
My reasons for this are:
1. Much of the current implementation depends on Lifecycle (e.g. JNDI,
configuration
On 02/15/2010 04:38 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
2010/2/12 Mark Thomas:
On 12/02/2010 15:20, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Some times ago, we discuss about mod_jk/cluster and more intelligent
strategy to be use for the dispatching system.
One point was to get system load informations abou
On 15/02/2010 14:42, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. All my comments below are preliminary ideas I
have had whilst trying to figure out how best to clean this up. Nothing
is absolute at this stage but whichever way I thought of things adding
Lifecycle to Container always seemed
On 15/02/2010 21:52, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 02/15/2010 04:38 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> 2010/2/12 Mark Thomas:
>>
>>> On 12/02/2010 15:20, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>
Hi to all,
Some times ago, we discuss about mod_jk/cluster and more intelligent
strategy to be us
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48566
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 16 00:46:07 2010
New Revision: 910370
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910370&view=rev
Log:
Workaround Java 6/7 bug described in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
Avoid the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 16 00:46:58 2010
New Revision: 910371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910371&view=rev
Log:
Proposed
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=910
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas 2010-02-16 00:48:14 UTC ---
As much as it pains me to have to add a workaround in Tomcat for a Java bug you
have a fair point that hiding the compilation error is a nasty side-effect.
Workaround added to 7.0
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
--- Comment #1 from Eiji Takahashi 2010-02-16 00:49:31 UTC
---
This issue reproduced by the simpler way.
I used the following.
httpd-2.2.3-31.el5.centos.2
mod_jk 1.2.28 and 1.2.29-dev
Tomcat 5.5.28
First, appropriately configuring t
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 16 00:51:45 2010
New Revision: 910373
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910373&view=rev
Log:
Vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=910373&
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #20 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-02-16
03:23:00 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=24991)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24991)
2010-02-16_tc7_bug42390_bug48616.patch
Patch for trunk that
- reverts r
I prepared a patch for BZ 48616, 42390 for trunk, see
comment 20 in BZ 48616:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616#c20
Unless there are complaints, and if it passes TCK, it can be applied.
The solution to the issue was a bit unexpected for me, but I think it
is for the better
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #21 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-02-16
04:01:29 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=24992)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24992)
2010-02-16_tc6_bug42390_bug48616.patch
Patch for Tomcat 6.0
--
Config
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #22 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-02-16
04:14:49 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=24993)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24993)
2010-02-16_tc55_bug42390_bug48616.patch
Patch for Tomcat 5.5
--
Confi
Author: kkolinko
Date: Tue Feb 16 04:36:31 2010
New Revision: 910394
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910394&view=rev
Log:
proposals
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
Author: kkolinko
Date: Tue Feb 16 04:52:38 2010
New Revision: 910395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910395&view=rev
Log:
Additional test for BZ 48616
Added:
tomcat/trunk/test/webapp/bug48616b.jsp (with props)
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/jasper/compiler/TestScriptingVar
2010/2/15 Mark Thomas :
> On 14/02/2010 06:47, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
>> + 2. isImplemetedAsFragment() method is wrong.
>> + 1) A fragment can also be created with when calling
>> a tag,
>> + when the attribute is declared being of type JspFragment.
>> + -see JSP.5.10
On 02/16/2010 12:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/02/2010 21:52, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
why not just a servlet filter?
+1. I was going to suggest the same thing.
Why not reusing the clustering code for that.
It would allow to pre-redirect the requests
without doing the actual ping
41 matches
Mail list logo
