On 5/2/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
> Did you figure out what he is talking about ? Could you summarise - I
> can't parse his rant.
To be honest, not really. The point is that I simplified the deployer so
that only one meaningful information is considered
Costin Manolache wrote:
Did you figure out what he is talking about ? Could you summarise - I
can't parse his rant.
To be honest, not really. The point is that I simplified the deployer so
that only one meaningful information is considered (for example, when
deploying an archive the path come
Did you figure out what he is talking about ? Could you summarise - I
can't parse his rant.
Costin
On 5/2/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas Whitmore wrote:
> Perhaps my bug report came across as a rant, because it had covered
> several attempts all of which featured Contexts
Thomas Whitmore wrote:
Perhaps my bug report came across as a rant, because it had covered
several attempts all of which featured Contexts being non-functional
or deployment auto-deleting what it shouldn't have,
because I'd already read the docs, searched the web, read the NGs,
read the bug repo
