Costin Manolache wrote:
Did you figure out what he is talking about ? Could you summarise - I can't parse his rant.
To be honest, not really. The point is that I simplified the deployer so that only one meaningful information is considered (for example, when deploying an archive the path comes from the archive name, etc) rather than a random one. I have stated previously I was ok if someone redid the deployer completely (it's all in Host/ContextConfig, so it should be possible), as it could be more flexible, etc. I don't think trying to extend the current one would work really well, and it's not exactly trivial either.
Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
