On 5/2/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
> Did you figure out what he is talking about ? Could you summarise - I
> can't parse his rant.
To be honest, not really. The point is that I simplified the deployer so
that only one meaningful information is considered (for example, when
deploying an archive the path comes from the archive name, etc) rather
than a random one. I have stated previously I was ok if someone redid
the deployer completely (it's all in Host/ContextConfig, so it should be
possible), as it could be more flexible, etc. I don't think trying to
extend the current one would work really well, and it's not exactly
trivial either.
So what's the problem ? Should we better explain why the previous
behavior was bad and was removed ? Add more info next to 'WON'T FIX' ?
Anyone can implement any deployer they want - we have all the hooks
one would need, and if a hook is missing we can add it. But we also
have to simplify and make things more consistent in the default
tomcat.
Costin
