On 16/05/2022 18:54, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I had considered using ant.tstamp.now.iso (you can see I had it in the
patch, actually), but I think it changes the required version of ant for
building. Since this is expected to be used by Tomcat release-managers
only, I think that's a reasonab
Mark,
On 5/16/22 12:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/05/2022 14:27, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Awesome. I have a small commit to build.xml that drops environmental
information (e.g. versions, etc.) to a build-release.properties file,
but I'm unable to generate the timestamp in the correct format
On 06/05/2022 14:27, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Awesome. I have a small commit to build.xml that drops environmental
information (e.g. versions, etc.) to a build-release.properties file,
but I'm unable to generate the timestamp in the correct format in order
to put it into the file. Here's the
Le 05/05/2022 à 21:28, Mark Thomas a écrit :
TL;DR we have platform independent repeatable release builds
That's really a great achievement, thank you. I hope this will inspire
other Apache projects to make their builds reproducible.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
Mark,
On 5/5/22 15:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
TL;DR we have platform independent repeatable release builds
Excellent work. Thanks for putting in the time it took for all this.
And now for the longer version:
Nearly all of the plumbing is in place for this. I have one more commit
to add to hand
On 23/03/2022 17:20, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 3/22/22 13:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
Finally, I have some minor modifications to buidl.xml that will enable
repeatable builds. Once everything is in place the build process will
look like:
- prepare for tagging as currently (update versio
Mark,
On 3/22/22 13:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
Finally, I have some minor modifications to buidl.xml that will enable
repeatable builds. Once everything is in place the build process will
look like:
- prepare for tagging as currently (update version in
build.properties.default and edit changel
Mark,
On 3/23/22 12:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/03/2022 16:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
??
$ ant javadoc
Dumps everything into output/dist/webapps/docs/, no ZIP files. The
"javadoc" target executes tasks and that's it.
What am I missing?
Look in the individual Javadoc directories. Eac
On 23/03/2022 16:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 3/22/22 15:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/03/2022 19:06, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 3/22/22 13:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
The JSign Ant task that adds the detached signature doesn't close
the signed file. This causes problems for Ant.
Mark,
On 3/22/22 15:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/03/2022 19:06, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 3/22/22 13:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
The JSign Ant task that adds the detached signature doesn't close the
signed file. This causes problems for Ant. I've opened a JSign issue
[2] for this. I have a
On 22/03/2022 19:06, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 3/22/22 13:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
The JSign Ant task that adds the detached signature doesn't close the
signed file. This causes problems for Ant. I've opened a JSign issue
[2] for this. I have a locally build version with a hack that fixes
Mark,
On 3/22/22 13:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to provide a status update on this.
The bnd issue [1] has been fixed and will be included in the next
release. We can switch to the latest bnd snapshot to pick up that fix in
the meantime.
I have tested detached signatures with JS
12 matches
Mail list logo
