Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-14 Thread Mladen Turk
On 09/14/2010 11:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: No-one has objected since he asked and since "merit never expires" I don't believe a vote is required to restore his access. I have therefore (re-)granted Bill commit karma to the Tomcat tree. Technically this is a PMC chair task but I have the karma to

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/09/2010 09:42, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Just waiting on a commit bit to be restored, unless there is objection. > I don't think I broke things too badly when I used it previously ;) Bill is listed in the emeritus committers section on [1] and I've confirmed from the archives that Bill ha

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 9/8/2010 12:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > +1 to everything you suggested to change. If you improve the dsps, you might > want to take > a look at > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43303 Just worked though jk.rc and it was fairly straight forward, just adding a JK_DLL_SUF

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 9/11/2010 5:03 PM, Tim Whittington wrote: > +1 from me. > > I've been maintaining my own VS 2003 (and now 2005) solution for a while now > with Apache 2.0/2.2 projects. Once this is committed, you should be able to load the .dsp into vs.net thru vs 2010 and convert with minimal issues. -

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-11 Thread Tim Whittington
+1 from me. I've been maintaining my own VS 2003 (and now 2005) solution for a while now with Apache 2.0/2.2 projects. cheers tim On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:51 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > It seems I've been lax in committing anything in recent memory, and had my > commit privileges for the j

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-08 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 9/8/2010 12:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > +1 to everything you suggested to change. If you improve the dsps, you might > want to take > a look at > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43303 Yea, I'm happy to add .rc's (VERSION resources) to the binaries, should be straightfo

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.09.2010 19:27, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 9/8/2010 12:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 09/08/2010 06:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: It seems I've been lax in committing anything in recent memory, and had my commit privileges for the jk module suspended :) But wanted to pass on these ve

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-08 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 9/8/2010 12:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 09/08/2010 06:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> It seems I've been lax in committing anything in recent memory, and had my >> commit privileges for the jk module suspended :) But wanted to pass on these >> very small proposals; >> > > Sure. Note th

Re: Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-08 Thread Mladen Turk
On 09/08/2010 06:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: It seems I've been lax in committing anything in recent memory, and had my commit privileges for the jk module suspended :) But wanted to pass on these very small proposals; Sure. Note that I'm using Makefile.vc for building the binaries, so

Proposed .dsp and source change to jk for apache 2.0

2010-09-08 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
It seems I've been lax in committing anything in recent memory, and had my commit privileges for the jk module suspended :) But wanted to pass on these very small proposals; * mod_jk.dsp should have referred to a project 'named' mod_jk, the 'project name' should generally match the name of th