2014-03-10 14:03 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
> There are 52 warning shown by Eclipse IDE.
> Most of them are boxing/unboxing ones.
>
> To remind, the setting are documented here:
> res\ide-support\eclipse\java-compiler-errors-warnings.txt
>
Ahah, ok, NIO2 does a lof of boxing/unboxing indeed.
2014-03-08 4:41 GMT+04:00 Rémy Maucherat :
> 2014-03-07 23:16 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
>
>> 1. It is a month since release 8.0.3 and thus I think 8.0.4 is
>> expected in a week or so..
>>
>> I am -1 to destabilize 8.0.x now.
>>
>
> As a new component, it is not supposed to destabilize the oth
2014-03-07 23:16 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 1. It is a month since release 8.0.3 and thus I think 8.0.4 is
> expected in a week or so..
>
> I am -1 to destabilize 8.0.x now.
>
As a new component, it is not supposed to destabilize the other components
that are in 8.0.
>
> To this, as you ar
2014-03-07 19:17 GMT+04:00 Rémy Maucherat :
> 2014-03-04 17:16 GMT+01:00 Rémy Maucherat :
>
>> The code is there (rebased to the current trunk):
>> https://github.com/rmaucher/tomcat
>>
>> Updated commit here:
> https://github.com/rmaucher/tomcat/commit/614d8c43d8d1f3eeb4d5e4c2493ead589a72bf2c
>
>
2014-03-04 17:16 GMT+01:00 Rémy Maucherat :
> The code is there (rebased to the current trunk):
> https://github.com/rmaucher/tomcat
>
> Updated commit here:
https://github.com/rmaucher/tomcat/commit/614d8c43d8d1f3eeb4d5e4c2493ead589a72bf2c
I have removed the two main hacks and the testsuite stat
Rémy,
On 3/4/14, 2:23 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2014-03-04 19:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>> Can you wait until we split 8.0.x from trunk or did you want to get this
>> into 8.0.x?
>>
>
> Depends, if you want to branch soon or not. It would have to be
> experimental for a while anyway, but it
On 03/04/2014 07:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Can you wait until we split 8.0.x from trunk or did you want to get this
into 8.0.x?
I would like to see it in 8.0.x so we can have it in the talk Chris and
I present at the ApacheCon.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
2014-03-04 21:51 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> >> Can you wait until we split 8.0.x from trunk or did you want to get this
> >> into 8.0.x?
> >>
> >
> > Depends, if you want to branch soon or not. It would have to be
> > experimental for a while anyway, but it will likely bring something
> useful.
>
>
On 04/03/2014 19:23, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2014-03-04 19:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> On 04/03/2014 16:16, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been working on porting a NIO2 connector that was originally
>> developed
>>> for JBoss AS by Nabil Benothman (an intern at Red Hat). Due to th
2014-03-04 19:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 04/03/2014 16:16, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been working on porting a NIO2 connector that was originally
> developed
> > for JBoss AS by Nabil Benothman (an intern at Red Hat). Due to the very
> > different connector structure in Tomca
On 04/03/2014 16:16, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on porting a NIO2 connector that was originally developed
> for JBoss AS by Nabil Benothman (an intern at Red Hat). Due to the very
> different connector structure in Tomcat and my preference for basing it on
> the existing NIO
On 03/04/2014 05:16 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
Pros:
- Significantly faster, although the API looks slower by design
Actually I didn't bench it yet but I benched "something similar" on
JBossWeb: it performed faster than APR, the implementation is a bit
different in that area so I will retest i
Hi,
I've been working on porting a NIO2 connector that was originally developed
for JBoss AS by Nabil Benothman (an intern at Red Hat). Due to the very
different connector structure in Tomcat and my preference for basing it on
the existing NIO1 connector, it is mostly new code, though.
So I would
13 matches
Mail list logo
