https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #65 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #64)
> The plan is:
> 1. Add the JSR 356 implementation to Tomcat 7
> 2. Deprecate Tomcat's proprietary API in Tomcat 7 (it will still be
> supported for Tomc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #65 from Jackie Rosen ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #64 from Mark Thomas ---
The plan is:
1. Add the JSR 356 implementation to Tomcat 7
2. Deprecate Tomcat's proprietary API in Tomcat 7 (it will still be supported
for Tomcat 7)
3. Remove Tomcat's proprietary API in Tomcat 8 onwar
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #63 from Julian Hall ---
Query - now JSR 356 has been finalised with a substantially different API to
the one you have implemented here, will this API continue to be supported, or
will it be removed in a near-future release?
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Gurkan Erdogdu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0.21 |trunk
--
Configure bugmail: http
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@yahoo.com
--
Configure bu
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #62 from Konstantin Kolinko 2012-03-16
00:54:29 UTC ---
Just a note:
Backport of WebSockets support to Tomcat 6 is tracked separately as bug #52918
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #60 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-12 21:59:38 UTC
---
Created attachment 28457
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28457
Chat example collision fix and cleanup
Please find attached patch for simple chat ex
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #59 from Mark Thomas 2012-03-06 22:21:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #58)
> Created attachment 28426 [details]
> Multiplayer snake collision fix
>
> Thanks for taking the time to fix the warnings, formatting and taking in the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #58 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-06 21:54:46 UTC
---
Created attachment 28426
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28426
Multiplayer snake collision fix
Thanks for taking the time to fix the warnings, form
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #57 from Mark Thomas 2012-03-06 15:15:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> Created attachment 28420 [details]
> Multiplayer snake example
Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
I did clean up a few warnings and reduced some line lengt
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
r...@thelightfamily.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@thelightfamily.com
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Johno Crawford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28416|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #55 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-05 00:51:03 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #53)
> (In reply to comment #52)
> > Created attachment 28415 [details]
> > Connection close not called on IOE
>
> I fixed this slightly differently in t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #54 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-05 00:48:11 UTC
---
Created attachment 28416
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28416
Multiplayer snake example
Please find attached patch for simple multiplayer snake ex
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #53 from Mark Thomas 2012-03-04 14:25:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> Created attachment 28415 [details]
> Connection close not called on IOE
I fixed this slightly differently in trunk, mainly because I wanted to avoid
t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #52 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-04 12:12:58 UTC
---
Created attachment 28415
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28415
Connection close not called on IOE
I am able to continually produce this using Chrom
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #51 from Mark Thomas 2012-03-02 19:15:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #48)
> Created attachment 28410 [details]
> Improved echo example
Patch applied. Many thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/user
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #50 from Mark Thomas 2012-03-02 19:10:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> Created attachment 28411 [details]
> Overrides for connection open and close
Patch applied (with some minor tweaks). Many thanks.
I can see this evol
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Johno Crawford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28408|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #48 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-02 12:53:06 UTC
---
Created attachment 28410
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28410
Improved echo example
Please find attached proposal for improved echo example. Still
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #47 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-02 01:57:32 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #46)
> Created attachment 28408 [details]
> Overrides for connection open and close
>
> I am currently working on an example for websockets. Please consi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #46 from Johno Crawford 2012-03-01 19:13:34 UTC
---
Created attachment 28408
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28408
Overrides for connection open and close
I am currently working on an example for web
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #45 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-29 20:56:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> Please find attached proposal of introducing status code constants instead of
> using magic numbers everywhere, also contains some typo fixes.
Thanks.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #44 from Johno Crawford 2012-02-29 15:12:41 UTC
---
Created attachment 28407
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28407
Introduce status code constants
Please find attached proposal of introducing status
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #43 from Johno Crawford 2012-02-28 17:29:47 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #42)
> (In reply to comment #41)
> > Thought it might be interesting to try out Autobahn with latest trunk
> > (r1294541) on a couple of different platfor
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #42 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-28 11:56:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> Thought it might be interesting to try out Autobahn with latest trunk
> (r1294541) on a couple of different platforms to see how things go.
Try readin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Johno Crawford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28396|Autobahn websocket report |Autobahn fail threaddump
d
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #41 from Johno Crawford 2012-02-28 11:43:52 UTC
---
Created attachment 28396
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28396
Autobahn websocket report
Thought it might be interesting to try out Autobahn with l
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #40 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-23 12:42:40 UTC ---
The bulk of the implementation is complete in trunk and should be at a stage
where folks can take it out for a spin. Keep in mind it is far from final. One
of things where feedbac
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #39 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-19 16:35:14 UTC ---
Short update for folks not following the dev list.
- added fragmented packet support
- added *very* basic test client
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/us
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #38 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-16 23:30:35 UTC ---
I am extremely reluctant to apply the current fragmentation patch. It relies on
buffering individual fragments and - given the maximum fragment size - that is
simply not going to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #37 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-16 22:35:46 UTC ---
I can see the possible requirement for access to the request headers when
verifying the origin (and a few other processes). However, I'm leaning towards
not implementing that now
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #36 from Johno Crawford 2012-02-16 17:47:38 UTC
---
Created attachment 28342
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28342
Fragmentation control frames
Attaching patch sent by Petr Praus (mailing list).
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #35 from Lucas Dreyer 2012-02-13 13:53:52
UTC ---
+1, Tomcat is an integral part of our system and Web Socket support will be
awesome.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #34 from Johno Crawford 2012-02-10 11:20:39 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Given that these are potentially long running requests, keeping the original
> request object around might not be such a good idea. Would passing i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #33 from Pid 2012-02-10 09:45:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Flexibility more than anything, the developer may require access to the
> request
> in order to determine / set the initial state of the socket or application
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #32 from Adam Walczak 2012-02-09 23:53:16
UTC ---
PS. Oracle just put out JSR-356 for WebSockect:
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=356
might come in handy for this issue
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #31 from Johno Crawford 2012-02-08 10:37:53 UTC
---
Flexibility more than anything, the developer may require access to the request
in order to determine / set the initial state of the socket or application. I
will try and look
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #30 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-08 08:33:37 UTC ---
The origin changes look good. I'll incorporate them shortly.
Regarding the changes to createWebSocketInbound, I understand passing the
protocol but why pass the HttpServletReques
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #29 from Johno Crawford 2012-02-04 01:48:20 UTC
---
Created attachment 28264
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28264
Origin and protocol client handshake TODOs
Thought it might be helpful to try implem
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Johno Crawford changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jo...@sulake.com
--
Configure bu
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #28 from Mark Thomas 2012-02-01 10:13:31 UTC ---
An initial implementation has been added to trunk. Once the major TODOs have
been addressed, it will be back-ported to 7.0.x.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
nada changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||apache_bugzilla@valgronda.c
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Toub changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n.toubl...@gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #27 from Toub 2012-01-20 22:36:59 UTC ---
Thanks for the report!
Will try to deal with embedded jetty until a first version is released.
Definitely a must-have feature in Tomcat.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.o
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
David Corley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidcor...@gmail.com
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #26 from Mark Thomas 2012-01-18 22:35:07 UTC ---
I dug out my old ideas and have been updating them. You can see how far I have
got in [1]. Note that this is all very early days and pretty much everything is
subject to change an
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #25 from Pid 2012-01-10 09:35:09 UTC ---
> // WebSocket event processor
> public void event(WebSocketEvent event) throws IOException, ServletException
> {
> WebSocketServletRequest request = event.getHttpServletRequest(
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #24 from gober...@msn.com 2012-01-08 22:38:44 UTC ---
I actually played with Jetty WebSocket API last Friday and was able to embed it
into Tomcat quite easily. The only issue is that it has to be on a separate
port.
As I mentione
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas 2012-01-08 13:03:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Is there any estimate when WebSockets support will be implemented?
No.
The preparatory work of aligning the connectors is pretty much complete which
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #22 from gober...@msn.com 2012-01-05 22:33:32 UTC ---
Mark,
Is there any estimate when WebSockets support will be implemented?
As far as API, I would not mind if it is somewhat similar to the Comet
functionality. In fact it woul
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
gober...@msn.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gober...@msn.com
--
Configure b
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #21 from r...@symentis.com 2011-12-23 14:49:21 UTC ---
+1
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Stein Morten Hugubakken changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stein.morten.hugubakken@g
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #19 from Suresh Karuppannan 2011-11-16
12:06:59 UTC ---
+1, I'm looking into use it in our new product and I always prefer Tomcat.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #18 from Pid 2011-11-10 11:56:01 UTC ---
Monsoon seems to have stalled somewhat
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #17 from jfclere 2011-11-09 21:13:06 UTC ---
See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/labs/monsoon/trunk/ too
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail beca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
jfclere changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfcl...@gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #16 from Manuel Vergel 2011-10-18 10:00:11
UTC ---
+ 1 too. Greatly needed in my new projects.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Mike Slinn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0.12 |7.0.21
--- Comment #15 from Mike Slin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #14 from Harikrishnadhas Krishnaraj
2011-09-26 13:06:20 UTC ---
I'm Eagerly looking out tomcat to implement the Web Socket
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are r
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
mike_mac changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mike_mac...@yahoo.com
--
Configure bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas 2011-09-06 23:15:59 UTC ---
It might appear that there hasn't been much progress on this but there has been
a lot going on behind the scenes.
1. The HTTP connectors have been refactored to reduce duplicatio
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
raosiy...@163.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raosiy...@163.com
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #12 from gootd...@gmail.com 2011-06-30 02:23:31 UTC ---
Please add Web Sockets to Tomcat.
The functionality provided is incredible and finally allows our applications to
provide real time communication.
Instead of resorting to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #11 from Antoine Roux 2011-05-26
20:07:48 UTC ---
Hi,
This is definitely something I would love to see in Tomcat! Websockets will
allow to build richer web application and all major browsers already support
them.
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #10 from Pid 2011-05-22 20:29:54 UTC ---
> I can't have you polluting this thread with misinformation.
Maybe you need a superinjunction. ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #9 from Filip Hanik 2011-05-20 22:20:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> @Filip Hanik
> It is not the same thing as Comet, clearly you've never actually done any
> development with Comet or Websockets. I can't have you polluti
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #8 from Nikolas 2011-05-20 15:34:44
UTC ---
@Mark Thomas
"If practical". Heh
@Filip Hanik
It is not the same thing as Comet, clearly you've never actually done any
development with Comet or Websockets. I can't have you polluti
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #7 from Filip Hanik 2011-05-20 14:39:57 UTC ---
true, web sockets are really nothing more than comet, with some additional
packet info, and that could be deal with using an InputFilter
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apac
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas 2011-05-19 11:04:46 UTC ---
Current thinking on this is that Tomcat would provide the SocketIO API in a
similar manner to how Comet is supported. The underlying transports, e.g web
sockets, will also be expos
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Graeme Rocher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add support for HTML5 Web |Add support for Web Sockets
74 matches
Mail list logo
