Hi,
May I ask for your opinion on the following case:
When RemoteIpValve is enabled getServerPort returns inconsistent value
depending on the presence of protocolHeader (“x-forwarded-proto” by default)
Here is a short example
1) no x-forwarded-proto
curl -H "Host: myserverhost:32279" -H "x-forw
Niki Dokovski | @nickytd
On 26.08.2014, at 22:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/08/2014 20:49, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>> The observer role does not see actual ‘defects’. Only general statistic is
>> shown on the project dashboard.
>
> About as much use as a chocolate t
Niki Dokovski | @nickytd
On 26.08.2014, at 22:26, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
> On 26.08.2014, at 22:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 26/08/2014 18:02, Filip Hanik wrote:
>>> hook me up
>>
>> Done (and for everyone else who has asked).
>
> Thanks Ma
On 26.08.2014, at 22:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/08/2014 18:02, Filip Hanik wrote:
>> hook me up
>
> Done (and for everyone else who has asked).
Thanks Mark.
>
> It appears I now have admin karma for the Coverity's project for
> scanning Tomcat.
>
> The approach I am taking is Tomcat co
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> I have been pinged off-list by Coverity to say that they have set up
> Tomcat with a free account with their static code analysis service.
>
> I think I have the ability to send invitations so if anyone wants to
> take a l
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2014-01-30 Mark Thomas :
>
> > The proposed 8.0.1 release is:
> > [ ] Broken - do not release
> > [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.1 (alpha)
> > [X] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.1 (beta)
> > [ ] Stable - go ahead and releas
plies to Servlet 2.5 or
> > earlier containers and any other non-JavaEE container.
>
+1 Spec clarification would help in cases like this one.
>
> > Mark
> >
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
o resolve this dispute :)
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/10/29 Mark Thomas :
> > On 29/10/2013 13:24, Niki Dok
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 13:01, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/10/2013 12:41, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> >>
> >>> WebSocket container can be used in
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 12:41, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
> > WebSocket container can be used in Java SE env only but for a standard
> JSR
> > 356 compliance implementation an existing servlet container is needed.
>
> No it is n
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 11:46, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/10/2013 11:17, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree with Mark and loo
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 11:17, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
> > I agree with Mark and looked further in the spec looking for a list of
> > dependent specifications. Actually the only dependency I found is
> described
> > in 7.
Mark,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Thanks for your speed Mark!
>
> I'm hacking a temporary fix in TomEE waiting for the next release.
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rman
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Bob DeRemer wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Niki Dokovski [mailto:nick...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 9:24 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: websocket connection (a
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Bob DeRemer
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> In our implementation, we have a gateway app that uses jsr websockets to
>> commu
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Bob DeRemer wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> ** **
>
> In our implementation, we have a gateway app that uses jsr websockets to
> communication with our main application server. In a small system, we want
> to run them both on a single Tomcat instance using the same To
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 19:46, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is there a good reason why AbstractEndpoint in coyote does not have an
> > association with Handler through an abstract getter and setter? All
> >
Hi,
Is there a good reason why AbstractEndpoint in coyote does not have an
association with Handler through an abstract getter and setter? All
concrete implementations of AbstractEndpoint
[AprEndpoint,JIoEndpoint,NioEndpoint] provide a getter and a setter of a
AbstractEndpoint.Handler
Cheers
Niki
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 4:10 PM
> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > >
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> Konstantin,
>
> On 10/7/13 10:24 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 3:29 P
Hi,
just out of curiosity and a bit of fun...
While I was going through the tomcat source code I spotted missing naming
convention for the websocket implementation. If "catalina", "jasper",
"coyote" have their dedicated responsibilities and frequently used as a
reference point, the websocket contai
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
> Hi Niki,
> thank you for your reply.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Niki Dokovski [mailto:nick...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 7:47 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> &
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 11:58 PM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: 8.0.x / 7.0.x progress
> >
> > On 04/10/2013 22:49, Konst
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/08/2013 15:30, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> Investigating some Gump and BuildBot failures has identified a large
> >> block of functionality tha
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Investigating some Gump and BuildBot failures has identified a large
> block of functionality that still remains to be back-ported to 7.0.x -
> namely the changes to Coyote that allowed upgraded connections to
> support concurrent read and wri
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/08/2013 08:16, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >>> Mark,
> >>>
> >>> On 8/15/13 6:47 P
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >Mark,
> >
> >On 8/15/13 6:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> This isn't going to be quite as simple as I first thought.
> >>
> >> The WebSocket client API requires Java SE 7 or later.
> >> The WebSocket server API re
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 8/15/13 6:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > This isn't going to be quite as simple as I first thought.
> >
> > The WebSocket client API requires Java SE 7 or later.
> > The WebSocket server API r
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 28/06/2013 12:47, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> > while playing around with tyrus and tomcat implementation of websocket
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 28/06/2013 12:47, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > while playing around with tyrus and tomcat implementation of websocket I
> > spotted a difference in the way sendBinary is actually implemented. In
Hi folks,
while playing around with tyrus and tomcat implementation of websocket I
spotted a difference in the way sendBinary is actually implemented. In
short: tyrus uses bytebuffer.array(), hence there is no change in buffer's
position while we end with channel write operation that does this. Nei
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Rossen Stoyanchev <
rstoyanc...@gopivotal.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Niki Dokovski
> wrote:Further
> > on, if you choose to use connec
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM, wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
>>
>> --- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
>> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM, wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
>
> --- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
> > Generally, I dislike using system properties for any kind of
> configuration.
>
> I do as well.
>
> How
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2013/5/22 Niki Dokovski :
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Niki Dokovski
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Niki
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 17/05/2013 13:07, Niki Dokovski wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 17/05/2013 13:07, Niki Dokovski wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Developing some sample apps with websockets and tomcat 8 r
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/05/2013 13:07, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Developing some sample apps with websockets and tomcat 8 revealed two
> > issues I’d like to discuss here.
> >
> > 1. There is no
Hi,
Developing some sample apps with websockets and tomcat 8 revealed two
issues I’d like to discuss here.
1. There is no proxy support in the implementation of
WebSocketContainer.connectToServer calls. While playing around with the
code it was relatively easy to add this in the implementat
further to the default connector in
tomcat 8.
Best Regards
Nikolai
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Niki Dokovski wrote:
> Hello,
> here is a small example based on JSR 356 defined APIs and implementation
> in tomcat 8 resulting in non exiting websocket client request. There is
> nothin
-- Forwarded message --
From: Niki Dokovski
Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:40 PM
Subject: websocket client doesn't exit
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Hello,
here is a small example based on JSR 356 defined APIs and implementation in
tomcat 8 resulting in non exiting websocket c
43 matches
Mail list logo
