On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 19:46, Niki Dokovski wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a good reason why AbstractEndpoint in coyote does not have an > > association with Handler through an abstract getter and setter? All > > concrete implementations of AbstractEndpoint > > [AprEndpoint,JIoEndpoint,NioEndpoint] provide a getter and a setter of a > > AbstractEndpoint.Handler > > No they don't. The getters and setters use the endpoint specific Handler. > Yep that's true. Just spotted that in all of the Protocols implementations [Http11AprProtocol, Http11NioProtocol and Http11Protocol] there is duplication of the initialization of the handler in the constructors, so I though of some potential options for cleanup. What I am doing is to go through the coyote code and try to get a better understanding of it by providing yet another "dummy" protocol implementation. :) > Mark > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
