On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> Did there is plans, ideas or interest around about OSGI-fing Tomcat ?
Quotes from http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/04/springsource-app-platform
"...the SpringSource Application Platform, an application server
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> >
> > > I'm not sure it's the best idea, my goal is to move it out of sandbox,
> > > it already has enough experiments
> > > that need completion. and the main goal is to be 'lite' :-).
On Feb 5, 2008 2:06 PM, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 AM, jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The normal way is to go through the incubator process.
> >
> > Why? This is not a new project, Guy is not becoming a committe
On Feb 5, 2008 6:56 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
> > Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >> Rainer Jung wrote:
> >>> Remy Maucherat schrieb:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.16/
>
> According to t
On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Yoav,
>
> > On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
> > > "as-an-alternate" category before doing an
On 9/3/07, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to file the board report by next week for a board
> meeting on September 19th.
>
> Here is my draft, so please fill in the gaps, since it's my
> first one :)
Seems to me that theres a serious community issue here in TomcatLand -
w
On 6/26/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Why is it a bad idea?
This API does not seem particularly tied to Tomcat, and the other reason
is that I value Costin's opinion and usually try to incorporate his ideas.
Thanks for the explanation
On 6/26/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> I would suggest org.apache.tomcat.comet, pretty much standard across ASF
> java projects to have org.apache..
>
> no reason to create even more divergence in Tomcat, rather start
> consolidating it
Costin prop
he
official announcement goes out to give time for all the mirrors to
pick it up.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/modeler/downloads.html
Niall
Best regards
peter
Am 21.06.2007 um 13:46 schrieb Niall Pemberton:
> On 6/21/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/21/
On 6/21/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/07, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> many thanks to the very quick fix. I have test the svn head and it
> works. After you have the next offiziel build we can update
> the tomcat depe
day or tommorrow.
Niall
Best regards
peter
Am 21.06.2007 um 13:46 schrieb Niall Pemberton:
> On 6/21/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/21/07, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > No, and I think we can fix it later at 5.5.25.
>&g
On 6/21/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/07, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, and I think we can fix it later at 5.5.25.
> At commons modeler nightly build the bug is not fixed.
I created a Jira issue for this:
https://issues.apac
On 6/21/07, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, and I think we can fix it later at 5.5.25.
At commons modeler nightly build the bug is not fixed.
I created a Jira issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODELER-22
..and have patched modeler (m1 build) to include it:
On 6/1/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... by June 18th at the latest, because the Board meeting is on June
20th. But since I'll be leaving the country on vacation the preceding
weekend, our deadline is a bit earlier, let's say June 15th.
This is just an early heads-up. Anyone have
On 5/23/07, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to say thanks. :-)
+1 - this is great.
Niall
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Ok, I think I'm done, just need to document the very messy way of
> setting this up.
>
> BTW, I published 6.0.13 to th
On 4/5/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> OK theres no interest in Commons here but, thinking about it, location
> is minor - the real issue is about having a separatly released
> artifact that other projects can depend on - which
by plugging in the
standard EL.
Niall
[3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=481390
[4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=514550
[5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2930
[6] http://tinyurl.com/2g8oek
On 2/8/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTEC
Following a discussion on Commons Dev[1] about using the independent
EL implementation associated with the JSP 2.1 spec I wondered if there
is any interest in moving what Tomcat has over to Jakarta Commons?
The motivation for all of this is it would IMO be extremely useful for
projects to be able
18 matches
Mail list logo
