[Bug 69721] The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 --- Comment #6 from Paolo B. --- Ok! Now I understand the limit of me example: JSF always add 2 input hidden + input type submit If you set maxPartCount="5" You can upload only 2 files... Back to the problem, this new parameter also limits

[Bug 69721] The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 --- Comment #5 from Remy Maucherat --- maxPartCount is the number of total parts of the multipart, not the number of files. These changes are about the following CVEs (both rathed Important): - CVE-2025-48976 Apache Tomcat - DoS in Commons File

[Bug 69721] The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Strasser --- Think this is the reason: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/e34fe96ef8ee782b0e56b64358e8dc57cbe336a6#diff-57d2f0a72170743f6c3687a48997b2aa37d8d209efe200f00a0b9dc51fc7e572 No further opinion on t

[Bug 69721] The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Strasser --- Up to 10.1.41 this just worked. (It´s covered by integration-tests which run every night for PrimeFaces.) With 10.1.42 it´s now broken. As far as i looked into this there 10.1.42 switched to a newer ve

Buildbot success in on tomcat-9.0.x

2025-06-20 Thread buildbot
Build status: Build succeeded! Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/37/builds/1437 Blamelist: Mark Thomas , remm Build Text: build successful Status Detected: restored build Build Source Stamp: [branch 9.0.x] 5c8fc302d7f1da1aab9f81c671cbf7a98be2743f Steps: work

[Bug 69721] The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 Paolo B. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug 69721] The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 --- Comment #2 from Paolo B. --- if you configure on server.xml maxParameterCount="1" maxPartCount="5" maxPartHeaderSize="-1" The limit seems to be 2 files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee f

[Bug 69710] FileCountLimitExceededException is thrown in version 11.0.8

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #23 from Remy Maucherat --- For the record, +1 for 50 as the new default for maxPartCount. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -

[Bug 69721] The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal Status|NEW

[Bug 69710] FileCountLimitExceededException is thrown in version 11.0.8

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas --- That is a potential 800MB memory usage on Tomcat 9 + Java 8 and 400MB memory usage for everyone else. That seems to be a reasonable default to me. It is higher than I would selected given a free choice but

[Bug 69721] New: The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69721 Bug ID: 69721 Summary: The new Connector parameter 'maxPartCount' is not calculated correctly Product: Tomcat 10 Version: 10.1.42 Hardware: PC OS: Linux

(tomcat) branch 10.1.x updated: Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases

2025-06-20 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push: new 84bdbb0501 Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases 84bdb

[Bug 69710] FileCountLimitExceededException is thrown in version 11.0.8

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #22 from Brice --- I wanted to add my voice to those concerned about this change. Upgrading to Tomcat 10.1.42 introduced new org.apache.tomcat.util.http.fileupload.impl.FileCountLimitExceededException errors in some of our existin

[Bug 69717] DirResourceSet breaks with trailing slash on webAppMount

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69717 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: (tomcat) branch main updated: Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in Resources

2025-06-20 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 3:27 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 20/06/2025 13:13, r...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > remm pushed a commit to branch main > > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git > > > > > > The fo

(tomcat) branch main updated: Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases

2025-06-20 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 704409d602 Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases 704409d60

[Bug 69710] FileCountLimitExceededException is thrown in version 11.0.8

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #21 from Remy Maucherat --- We're really sorry for the trouble, but that's basically how CVEs work these days. They have to be secured by default regardless of the immediate consequences. There are plenty of examples out there of ve

(tomcat) branch 9.0.x updated: Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases

2025-06-20 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new 5c8fc302d7 Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases 5c8fc30

(tomcat) branch 11.0.x updated: Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases

2025-06-20 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 11.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/11.0.x by this push: new 5d8cc738ee Fix BZ 69717 - expand test cases 5d8cc

Re: (tomcat) branch main updated: Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in Resources

2025-06-20 Thread Mark Thomas
On 20/06/2025 13:13, r...@apache.org wrote: This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 4c68821

[Bug 69710] FileCountLimitExceededException is thrown in version 11.0.8

2025-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #20 from c.bollme...@lecare.com --- Hello, just to mention this subtle change did cost us 2.5 team days & a whole lot of stress searching for the needle in the haystack as our app suddenly didn't work anymore with multipart uploads.

(tomcat) branch 9.0.x updated: Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in Resources

2025-06-20 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new 0d4dda0068 Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in R

(tomcat) branch 10.1.x updated: Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in Resources

2025-06-20 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push: new c52bd4c3f5 Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in

(tomcat) branch 11.0.x updated: Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in Resources

2025-06-20 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch 11.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/11.0.x by this push: new ee27caa76d Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in

(tomcat) branch main updated: Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in Resources

2025-06-20 Thread remm
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. remm pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 4c688213d9 Allow trailing slash for webAppMount in Res

Re: Bugzilla now requires authentication

2025-06-20 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:06 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 19/06/2025 17:13, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > > > I guess maybe I don't understand the issue. BZ always required an > > account to write, and anyone could register for an account. A small > > hurdle, but present. The same is true for

Re: Bugzilla now requires authentication

2025-06-20 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/06/2025 17:13, Christopher Schultz wrote: I guess maybe I don't understand the issue. BZ always required an account to write, and anyone could register for an account. A small hurdle, but present. The same is true for GitHub. I'm not sure why we care about AI scrapers, given that all