On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 9:06 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 19/06/2025 17:13, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > <snip/> > > > I guess maybe I don't understand the issue. BZ always required an > > account to write, and anyone could register for an account. A small > > hurdle, but present. The same is true for GitHub. > > > > I'm not sure why we care about AI scrapers, given that all the mailing > > lists and source code are also public. Everything produced by the ASF > > and its committers over the years has already been stolen and had > > whatever IP protections it had stripped and thrown into a big blender. > > > > How does requiring a login to BZ to even *see* the bugs change anything? > > Or is this an issue of scale? AI scrapers want to pull every bug for the > > past 20 years and it's killing the service? And GitHub just has > > effectively-infinite resources? > > Exactly. The AI scrapers are hitting the BZ instances hard enough it is > effectively a DDoS. > > The authentication (for now) blocks the more expensive requests.
If it stabilizes things long term that would be awesome. It feels really snappy again. > > I have no particular preference. GH integrates nicely with PRs and all > > of that. If we move to anything, I'd say GH is the way to go. I find > > JIRA to be insufferable for some reason. > > Ack. I'd agree with "not Jira". That pretty much leaves GH issues as the > only alternative - if we want to switch. Emmanuel has a point that it gradually makes us too GH dependent. Not so cool. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
