n828cl commented on PR #762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/762#issuecomment-2404044482
As previously stated, the 10.0.x branch is well past end-of-life (over three
years ago); there will be no further updates to this level. Anyone not updating
a product in that length of time c
n828cl closed pull request #762: Report HTTP/2 header parsing errors earlier
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/762
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
LQxdu commented on PR #762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/762#issuecomment-2404037105
During a recent network asset mapping assessment, we identified that a
significant number of services are still deployed on Tomcat 10.0.x. Given the
continued widespread use of this version, w
isapir commented on PR #762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/762#issuecomment-2403933166
Is there a reason you are using Tomcat 10.0 and not Tomcat 10.1? Tomcat
10.0 is no longer supported
See https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-10.0-eol.html
--
This is an automated messa
isapir commented on code in PR #761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/761#discussion_r1794578764
##
java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java:
##
@@ -1209,7 +1213,11 @@ public void setStatus(int status) {
return;
}
-getCoyoteRespo
isapir commented on code in PR #761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/761#discussion_r1794575451
##
java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Response.java:
##
@@ -1069,16 +1069,20 @@ public void sendError(int status, String message)
throws IOException {
return;
LQxdu opened a new pull request, #762:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/762
We found that the 10.0.x branch is also affected by
CVE-2024-24549(https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7w75-32cg-r6g2), but it has
not been fixed yet. Therefore, we have created this patch for 10.0.x based
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69387
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://glamourmumbai.com/ |
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69387
--- Comment #2 from Chuck Caldarale ---
The content of attachment 39900 has been deleted for the following reason:
Spam
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
isapir commented on PR #760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760#issuecomment-2403740181
Oh, I see the code that you use to benchmark in the PR. Have you tried to
run an external tool like `ab` or `wrk2`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
isapir commented on PR #760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760#issuecomment-2403736338
> In Performance Test, request client threads have sleep ops.
Why? Can those be removed?
> Average cost of each rateLimiter is about 3500ns. The difference in time
cost between F
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69387
Madhavi Singh changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://glamourmumbai.com/
Chenjp commented on PR #760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760#issuecomment-2403720730
> The performance results look odd to me. I'd expect throughput to be
significantly higher in all cases. I wonder if the request processing time is
dominating the results rather than any over
Mark,
On 10/9/24 13:05, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Oct 9 17:05:58 2024
New Revision: 1921212
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921212&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Oops, thanks.
-chris
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/761#issuecomment-2402893460
I noticed that `Response` does some things that `ResponseFacade` does not.
Specifically, it is sensitive to whether or not there is an *include* in
progress. However, if the `Resp
ChristopherSchultz opened a new pull request, #761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/761
Use sendError(103) or setStatus(103).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
Author: markt
Date: Wed Oct 9 17:05:58 2024
New Revision: 1921212
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921212&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/vi
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security.html (original)
+++ t
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-85-eol.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-85-eol.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-85-eol.html (
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-8.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-8.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-8.html (original)
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews-2010.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews-2010.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews-2010.html (ori
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/index.html (original)
+++ tomcat/sit
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews-2018.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews-2018.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews-2018.html (ori
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/resources.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/resources.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/resources.html (original)
++
Author: markt
Date: Wed Oct 9 17:02:30 2024
New Revision: 1921211
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921211&view=rev
Log:
Update site for 11.0.0 release (including removal of beta tag)
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugreport.html
tomc
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/migration-11.0.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/migration-11.0.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/migration-11.0.htm
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-connectors.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-connectors.html?rev=1921211&r1=1921210&r2=1921211&view=diff
==
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download
Author: markt
Date: Wed Oct 9 17:01:01 2024
New Revision: 1921210
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921210&view=rev
Log:
Update docs for 11.0.0 release
[This commit notification would consist of 65 parts,
which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
--
Author: markt
Date: Wed Oct 9 16:36:37 2024
New Revision: 72230
Log:
Release Tomcat 11.0.0
Added:
release/tomcat/tomcat-11/v11.0.0/
- copied from r72229, dev/tomcat/tomcat-11/v11.0.0/
Removed:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-11/v11.0.0/
-
The following votes were cast:
Binding:
+1: isapir, remm, ebourg, schultz, rjung, fschumacher, markt
Non-binding:
+1: dsoumis
No other votes were cast. The vote therefore passes.
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
Mark
---
On 03/10/2024 11:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 11.0.0 release is:
[ ] -1 Broken - do not release
[X] +1 Stable - go ahead and release as 11.0.0
+1
Tests pass on:
- Linux (OpenSSL 3.0.13 from Ubuntu 24.04)
- Windows (OpenSSL 3.0.14 - Native 2.0.8 binaries)
- MacOS (Intel) (OpenSSL 3.3.1)
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377
--- Comment #3 from John Engebretson ---
Thank you! I've enabled it locally and immediately ran into some edge case
bugs causing a few JSPs to fail compilation. I'll work through those and
contribute fixes on this ticket.
--
You are receivi
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Oct 9 15:45:08 2024
New Revision: 72227
Log:
Drop old release artifact
Removed:
release/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.30/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional comman
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Oct 9 15:44:46 2024
New Revision: 1921209
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921209&view=rev
Log:
Announce v10.1.31 release.
[This commit notification would consist of 66 parts,
which exceeds the limit of 50 ones, so it was shortened to the summary.]
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
schultz pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new f15366cc25 Add release date
f15366cc25 is descr
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 5:20 PM Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>
> All,
>
> On 10/3/24 17:35, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.31 release is now available for
> > voting.
> >
> > All committers and PMC members are kindly requested to provide a vote if
> > possible. ANY TOM
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Oct 9 15:25:10 2024
New Revision: 72226
Log:
Promose v10.1.31 to released.
Added:
release/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.31/
- copied from r72225, dev/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.31/
Removed:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.31/
All,
The following votes were cast:
+1: isapir, remm, markt, rjung, fschumacher, schultz
Non-binding:
+1: dsoumis
No other votes were cast, therefore the vote passes.
Thanks to everyone who contributed toward this release.
And Happy Birthday!
-chris
On 10/3/24 17:35, Christopher Schultz w
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 8e90a82759 Update
8e90a82759 is described below
commi
All,
On 10/3/24 17:35, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.31 release is now available for
voting.
All committers and PMC members are kindly requested to provide a vote if
possible. ANY TOMCAT USER MAY VOTE, though only PMC members votes are
binding. We welcome non-comm
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69386
--- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat ---
The deprecated method will remain in 10.1.x and 9.0.x in the future. However
the method is removed in 11.0.x.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69386
--- Comment #2 from Jonathon Merz ---
Understood, and thank you very much for fixing anyway even though it's not the
ideal path! I will assume that the deprecated method won't last long and will
get to consolidated dependencies as quickly as po
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
This is certainly a feature from a long time ago (Tomcat 5). At the time
Kin-man did it because JSTL was very very slow. Obviously tags remain an order
of magnitude slower than hand crafted code.
Anyway,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377
--- Comment #1 from John Engebretson ---
So, I found my way to TagPluginManager, and the existing code in
org.apache.jasper.tagplugins.jstl.core that does exactly what I asked for.
Sorry. :)
Do I correctly grasp that I need a dedicated XML f
markt-asf commented on PR #758:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/758#issuecomment-2402184594
From memory of previous discussions, implementing Request/Response wrapping
in Valves is non-trivial. I'd expose a setter for `requestId`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
Chenjp commented on PR #760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760#issuecomment-2402162598
> Could the headers follow
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers/ ?
Great! Will look into the spec and implement it tomorrow.
--
This is an automated
markt-asf commented on PR #760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760#issuecomment-2402047535
The performance results look odd to me. I'd expect throughput to be
significantly higher in all cases. I wonder if the request processing time is
dominating the results rather than any ove
markt-asf commented on PR #760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760#issuecomment-2402045763
Could the headers follow
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers/ ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
markt-asf commented on PR #757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/757#issuecomment-2402040291
Closing in favour of new PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
markt-asf closed pull request #757: BZ69355: RateLimitFilter2 with
FixedWindowRateLimiter
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/757
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
Build status: Build succeeded!
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/37/builds/1121
Blamelist: Rainer Jung , remm
Build Text: build successful
Status Detected: restored build
Build Source Stamp: [branch 9.0.x] ecd4aa1af00ca055df9f709cd3c88d315b71b0fa
Steps:
work
Chenjp commented on PR #757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/757#issuecomment-2401707085
new PR #760
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
Chenjp opened a new pull request, #760:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760
Original PR: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/757
1. Accurate rate limiter.
2. exposeHeaders - disabled by default, for debugging purpose only.
3. Performance test shows
(org.apache.catalina
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69386
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new ecd4aa1af0 Add back method as deprecated
ecd4aa1af0
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new cf2ae185c2 Add back method as deprecated
cf2ae185c
56 matches
Mail list logo
