Hi,
2017-01-19 1:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.41/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor
Hi,
2017-01-18 23:45 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.75 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.75/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
Ralf Hauser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hau...@acm.org
--
You are receiving thi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362
--- Comment #10 from Josh Soref ---
https://github.com/jech/polipo/blob/master/tunnel.c#L302
const char *message = "HTTP/1.1 200 Tunnel established\r\n\r\n";
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60632
Chuck Caldarale changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59390
--- Comment #4 from Jeff Turner ---
> 2) solution should be that systemctl status should report directly that ths
> ssl configuration is failed, and the other configuration are fine, but
> starting tomcat, unlike solution 1).
The lack of err
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60632
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Turner ---
FYI I can't add an attachment - keep getting 'Permission denied' from
attachment.cgi. Here's the suggested patch:
--- bin/catalina.sh.orig2017-01-24 12:54:39.181880382 +1100
+++ bin/catalina.sh
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60632
Bug ID: 60632
Summary: Last logs lost when running Tomcat with systemd and
journald
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.x-trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Mark and Emmanuel,
On 1/23/17 5:01 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/01/2017 09:36, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With the fast adoption of Let's Encrypt many people are interested in
>> integrating it with Tomcat. A first step was to ensure that Tomcat can
>> directly use the PEM certificat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add ability to set cipher |Add ability to set cipher
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60623
--- Comment #12 from romain.manni-bucau ---
Ok, if you have a listener observing before_init or before_start on Context (or
even org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost#addChild) you can initialize some
context there, if you only deploy in this p
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60623
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
You are going to have to explain that code sample. It means nothing to me.
0 and negative numbers are already defined to have special meaning.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60623
--- Comment #10 from romain.manni-bucau ---
> Code that relies on the deployment mechanism for correct clean-up is broken
> and needs to be fixed. Deployment threads may be re-used before they are
> stopped and if any component fails to fully
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60623
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
Code that relies on the deployment mechanism for correct clean-up is broken and
needs to be fixed. Deployment threads may be re-used before they are stopped
and if any component fails to fully clean-up, the d
2017-01-18 23:45 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.75 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.75/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
2017-01-19 1:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.41/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
2017-01-18 22:45 GMT+01:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.75 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.75/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60627
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
The RFC6265 parser switches to RFC2109 rules if it sees $Version="1". It
currently treats any other version as unknown and rejects the header.
We could configure the RFC6265 parser to parse version 0 either
2017-01-19 0:07 GMT+01:00 Violeta Georgieva :
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.41/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/or
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
--- Comment #6 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #5)
> The point was to say that some JARs were needlessly scanned, and they could
> be filtered out. People go on to complain sometimes that the
Am 18. Januar 2017 22:45:53 MEZ schrieb Violeta Georgieva
:
>The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.75 release is now available for voting.
>
>It can be obtained from:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.75/
>The Maven staging repo is:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
Am 19. Januar 2017 00:07:32 MEZ schrieb Violeta Georgieva
:
>The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
>It can be obtained from:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.41/
>The Maven staging repo is:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
--- Comment #5 from Remy Maucherat ---
The point was to say that some JARs were needlessly scanned, and they could be
filtered out. People go on to complain sometimes that they have 1000s of JARs
in their webapp and it takes too long to start.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60627
--- Comment #1 from Ales Dolecek ---
The format used by the client is RFC 2109 or RFC 2965. So I guess it was
probably dropped from Rfc6265CookieProcessor intentionally.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
--- Comment #4 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #3)
> Maybe instead of
>
> "At least one JAR was scanned for TLDs yet contained no TLDs."
>
> use
>
> "At least one JAR was scanned for TLDs whi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Jung ---
Maybe instead of
"At least one JAR was scanned for TLDs yet contained no TLDs."
use
"At least one JAR was scanned for TLDs which contained no TLDs."
Would that make it easier to understand?
--
You are r
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362
--- Comment #9 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Mateusz Nowakowski from comment #8)
> >Do your clients require just some text after the space or do they really
> >analyze >the text for predefined values?
>
> They analy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> The message is correct.
>
> Of the JARs scanned, at least one JAR was scanned for TLDs without any TLDs
> being found in that JAR.
>
> Conf
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
Bug ID: 60629
Summary: Misleading/erroneous log message from
TldScanner#scanJars() about no TLDs in scanned JARs
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.11
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362
--- Comment #8 from Mateusz Nowakowski ---
>Do your clients require just some text after the space or do they really
>analyze >the text for predefined values?
They analyze the text, however they are compatible with previous behavior.
They ana
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60627
Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 23 14:16:32 2017
New Revision: 1779932
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779932&view=rev
Log:
Remove unused code, effectively reverting 1779370 and 1779612.
Java 9 is now handled in other branch of if/else.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/bu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362
--- Comment #7 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Mateusz Nowakowski from comment #6)
> Facts:
> 8.0.39 still returns the reason phase.
> 8.5.x and onward do not return the reason phase.
>
> Purpose of this story is to a
Hi,
2017-01-18 23:45 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.75 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.75/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito
Hi,
2017-01-19 1:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.41/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor
2017-01-22 17:59 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 6.0.50 release is now available for voting.
>
> Note: This is the last Tomcat 6 release.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.50/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60362
Mateusz Nowakowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.0.x-trunk |8.5.x-trunk
--- Comment #6 from M
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60613
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
The users list is the best place to discuss ways to handle problems with overly
large methods.
I've taken a quick look at the generated source and I don;t see any obvious
ways to reduce the size of the gener
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60490
--- Comment #6 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #5)
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> Fixed in:
> - trunk for 9.0.0.M18 onwards
> - 8.5.x for 8.5.12 onwards
Thank you very much, I can finally discont
I think it would be useful if we configured buildbot to publish
snapshots (probably as part of the daily build) to repository.a.o.
Therefore I have requested the appropriate credentials from infra and
when I have them I'll make the necessary changes tot he buildbot config.
It might also be necessar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60627
Bug ID: 60627
Summary: Wrong cookie makes Rfc6265CookieProcessor ommit all
following cookies
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.8
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 23 10:18:45 2017
New Revision: 1779901
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779901&view=rev
Log:
Make it easier for sub-classes of Tomcat to modify the default web.xml settings
by over-riding getDefaultWebXmlListener().
Patch provided by Aaron Anderson.
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 23 10:16:55 2017
New Revision: 1779900
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779900&view=rev
Log:
Make it easier for sub-classes of Tomcat to modify the default web.xml settings
by over-riding getDefaultWebXmlListener().
Patch provided by Aaron Anderson.
Modified:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/40
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 23 10:16:18 2017
New Revision: 1779899
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779899&view=rev
Log:
Make it easier for sub-classes of Tomcat to modify the default web.xml settings
by over-riding getDefaultWebXmlListener().
Patch provided by Aaron Anderson.
This closes #
On 23/01/2017 09:36, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the fast adoption of Let's Encrypt many people are interested in
> integrating it with Tomcat. A first step was to ensure that Tomcat can
> directly use the PEM certificates generated by the letsencrypt/certbot
> client. An important as
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60623
--- Comment #8 from romain.manni-bucau ---
Fact is tomcat kind of guarantee you execute code in a specific thread pool
(far from any user pool or http pool to be concrete).
So there is now a lot of code relying on deployment "initialization" s
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60623
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to romain.manni-bucau from comment #4)
> Can 1 keep current behavior and 0 or negative values use an executor
> executing directly the task? 1 is used and relying on deployer threads
> avoids to lea
Hi all,
With the fast adoption of Let's Encrypt many people are interested in
integrating it with Tomcat. A first step was to ensure that Tomcat can
directly use the PEM certificates generated by the letsencrypt/certbot
client. An important aspect of Let's Encrypt is automation, the
certificates a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60490
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 23 09:50:09 2017
New Revision: 1779898
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779898&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60490
Format improvements to ErrorReportValve
Patch by Michael Osipov
Modified:
tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk/ (props chan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60613
--- Comment #5 from M. Manna ---
Thanks - But isn't this going to cause quite a lot of Legacy systems to be
broken? Or do you expect developers to use the older versions of Tomcat?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 23 09:45:04 2017
New Revision: 1779897
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779897&view=rev
Log:
Update changelog
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60613
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
On 21/01/2017 16:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/01/2017 09:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2017-01-09 23:58 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
All,
As a result of a thread on the users list, a memory leak has been
discovered in java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.commonPool. It appears
that use of this pool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60613
--- Comment #3 from M. Manna ---
Also found the same problem when downgraded to 8.0.39. Hence, downgrading to
8.0.29. I am not facing the issue anymore with 8.0.29. Could someone please let
me know if a bugfix will be done on 8.5.11?
--
You a
Hi Konstantin,
Le 21/01/2017 à 08:58, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit :
> 1. Please update xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml as well.
Thanks I didn't see it.
> 2. I see that other "able-" flags use AS_HELP_STRING() macro to format
> help string.
>
> Maybe use it here as well?
I got a look and t
Author: ebourg
Date: Mon Jan 23 08:28:34 2017
New Revision: 1779891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779891&view=rev
Log:
Added myself to the list of committers
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whoweare.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whoweare.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/vie
Author: ebourg
Date: Mon Jan 23 07:59:54 2017
New Revision: 1779890
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1779890&view=rev
Log:
Changelog update
Modified:
tomcat/native/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/native/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.ap
60 matches
Mail list logo
