https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
--- Comment #4 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> --- (In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #3) > Maybe instead of > > "At least one JAR was scanned for TLDs yet contained no TLDs." > > use > > "At least one JAR was scanned for TLDs which contained no TLDs." > > Would that make it easier to understand? If I (user) wouldn't read the source code nor enabled debug, the message implies that: "Hey, I have scanned one JAR, found no TLD and gave up." The problem is the "At least one JAR", it sounds like fail-fast and not fail-last. I would rather expect: "n JARs were scanned, but some did not contain any TLDs. Enable ..." or "Some scanned JARs did not contain any TLDs. Enable ..." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
