https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60629
--- Comment #5 from Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> --- The point was to say that some JARs were needlessly scanned, and they could be filtered out. People go on to complain sometimes that they have 1000s of JARs in their webapp and it takes too long to start. The INFO log explains the JAR filtering part correctly, but the first part is too convoluted, and the "yet" -> "which" is marginally better, but not *so* much. I'm not sure who wrote that originally, maybe me who knows. -> "JAR scanner did not find TLDs in some JARs. Enable debug logging for this logger for a complete list of JARs. Skipping unneeded JARs during scanning can improve startup time and JSP compilation time.". That's shorter, is it better ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
