https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55837
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Mi ---
Should the method return the CanonicalPath or AbsolutePath?
I used this method in Tomcat 4 and it returned AbsolutePath and now I found
that it returns CanonicalPath which means the I couldn't locate my f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13904680#comment-13904680
]
Olivier Lamy (*$^¨%`£) commented on MTOMCAT-238:
[~lgarcia] If you want y
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 18 18:29:11 2014
New Revision: 1569465
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569465
Log:
Make it easier for TomEE to modify the j2seClassLoader
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings.properties
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 18 18:22:51 2014
New Revision: 1569461
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569461
Log:
Update
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml?re
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 18 18:19:18 2014
New Revision: 1569459
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569459
Log:
s/j2se/javase/
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings.properties
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java
Modified: tomcat/t
2014-02-18 18:49 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2014-02-18 20:01 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>
>>
We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an
over-ridable protected gette
2014-02-18 20:05 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>
>
>>> Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you
>>> could debug this and provide the full text of the merged web.xml?
>>>
>>
>> https:
2014-02-18 20:01 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>
>
>>> We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an
>>> over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter and setter etc.
>>> Does Tom
Thanks in all case, think we can close the debate now ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-18 17:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 16:06, Romain
On 18/02/2014 16:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 17:05 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>
>>
Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you
could debug this and provi
On 18/02/2014 16:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 17:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>
>>
We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an
over-ridable protected getter
2014-02-18 17:05 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>
>
>>> Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you
>>> could debug this and provide the full text of the merged web.xml?
>>>
>>
>> https:
On 18/02/2014 13:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> Looks like there might be a couple of problems here. Any chance you
>> could debug this and provide the full text of the merged web.xml?
>>
>
> https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/38292f66783c0d49965b
2014-02-18 17:01 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>
>
>>> We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an
>>> over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter and setter etc.
>>> Does Tom
On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an
>> over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter and setter etc.
>> Does TomEE have a preference?
>>
>
> not really while we c
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 18 16:00:34 2014
New Revision: 1569398
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1569398
Log:
Make it easier for TomEE to modify the j2seClassLoader
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/LocalStrings.properties
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13904147#comment-13904147
]
Laurent GARCIA edited comment on MTOMCAT-238 at 2/18/14 3:30 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Laurent GARCIA updated MTOMCAT-238:
---
Attachment: tomcat7-maven-plugin-2.2.jar.zip
Version patchée
> Parameter staticContextDocba
2014-02-18 13:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 12:01, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> 2014-02-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>
>
I got it from JspConfig:
>>>
>>> Got what from JspConfig?
>>
>> the previous stack:
>>
>> INFO: Apache
2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 10:50, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> 2014-02-18 11:44 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>
>
It was working fine before and it was convenient. By default you don't
add jars in tomcat system
On 18/02/2014 12:01, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> I got it from JspConfig:
>>
>> Got what from JspConfig?
>
> the previous stack:
>
> INFO: Apache Tomcat (TomEE)/7.0.52 (1.6.1-SNAPSHOT)
> - Error repo
2014-02-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> 2014-02-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> Yet again, please don't top post.
>>>
>>> On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validat
On 18/02/2014 11:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> Yet again, please don't top post.
>>
>> On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates
>>> the xml immediately and doesn't read the
On 18/02/2014 10:50, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 11:44 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> It was working fine before and it was convenient. By default you don't
>>> add jars in tomcat system loader so the behavior of tomcat was fine +
>>> in
2014-02-18 11:54 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> Yet again, please don't top post.
>
> On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates
>> the xml immediately and doesn't read the version from WebXml - from
>> ContextConfig with getMa
Yet again, please don't top post.
On 18/02/2014 10:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates
> the xml immediately and doesn't read the version from WebXml - from
> ContextConfig with getMajorVersion, getMinorVersion methods
Which Tomcat
2014-02-18 11:44 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> Again, please stop top posting.
>
> On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> let say we have an interface Foo. I deploy a war with Foo and FooImpl.
>> In the since I'm in embedded mode I can get FooImpl casting it to Foo.
>> Foo has been loaded fr
Again, please stop top posting.
On 18/02/2014 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> let say we have an interface Foo. I deploy a war with Foo and FooImpl.
> In the since I'm in embedded mode I can get FooImpl casting it to Foo.
> Foo has been loaded from the Junit JVM for instance and FooImpl from
>
edit: org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspConfig#processWebDotXml validates
the xml immediately and doesn't read the version from WebXml - from
ContextConfig with getMajorVersion, getMinorVersion methods
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.
let say we have an interface Foo. I deploy a war with Foo and FooImpl.
In the since I'm in embedded mode I can get FooImpl casting it to Foo.
Foo has been loaded from the Junit JVM for instance and FooImpl from
the webapp cause we use a framework (spring, CDI, ...). The cast will
fail cause FooImpl
Hi
false is no more supported by
default int tomcat for filter?
it is used in tcks and seems broken now
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
--
On 18/02/2014 10:07, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2014-02-18 11:04 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 18/02/2014 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> it doesn't cover the embedded case at all
>>
>> What doesn't? Why?
>
> In embedded case you deploy an app with your classes in the JVM and
> want 1/2 o
2014-02-18 11:04 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> Please don't top post.
>
> On 18/02/2014 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> We did it but
>
> Did what?
used filter()
>
>> it doesn't cover the embedded case at all
>
> What doesn't? Why?
In embedded case you deploy an app with your classes in the JVM
Please don't top post.
On 18/02/2014 09:59, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> We did it but
Did what?
> it doesn't cover the embedded case at all
What doesn't? Why?
> since you want to use system classloader.
What do you want to use that class loader for?
> I know this is a case tomcat doesn't han
We did it but it doesn't cover the embedded case at all since you want
to use system classloader. I know this is a case tomcat doesn't handle
but it breaks applications using it before (new Tomcat() too).
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: htt
On 18/02/2014 09:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hello
>
> seems now parent classloader used to avoid to overwrite classes is
> j2seClassLoader which is extclassloader by default. This totally
> breaks tomee and i guess other apps since classes which were not
> overwritten in standalone (new Tomca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55943
--- Comment #8 from romain.manni-bucau ---
Hi
this totaally breaks tomcat and tomee usage in embeded mode (+ has a lot of
side effect in normal mode).
1) the j2seClassLoader is not overridable in children classloader which is a
pain since
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56137
Ognjen Blagojevic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Ogn
PS: BTW system varaible is no more used in new code
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-18 10:21 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hello
>
> seems now parent
Hello
seems now parent classloader used to avoid to overwrite classes is
j2seClassLoader which is extclassloader by default. This totally
breaks tomee and i guess other apps since classes which were not
overwritten in standalone (new Tomcat) are now overwritten by webapp
classloader.
Is it intend
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas
41 matches
Mail list logo
