2014-02-18 18:49 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com>: > 2014-02-18 20:01 GMT+04:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> >> <snip/> >> >>>> We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an >>>> over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter and setter etc. >>>> Does TomEE have a preference? >>>> >>> >>> not really while we can change it, we were used to protected field but >>> protected getter would be nice too. >> >> What do you think of >> http://svn.apache.org/r1569398 >> >> If that is OK, I'll back-port it to 7.0.x with the one change that >> j2seClassLoader will be a protected rather than private field in 7.0.x. > > By the way, "j2se" is called "JavaSE" nowadays, starting with Java 5. >
same for jee/j2ee and JavaEE. Think I saw some j2ee in tomcat jndi part IIRC. > Best regards, > Konstantin Kolinko > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
