On 18/02/2014 13:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2014-02-18 12:09 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <[email protected]>:
<snip/> >> We can certainly make that easier. Making it non-final, using an >> over-ridable protected getter(), adding protected getter and setter etc. >> Does TomEE have a preference? >> > > not really while we can change it, we were used to protected field but > protected getter would be nice too. What do you think of http://svn.apache.org/r1569398 If that is OK, I'll back-port it to 7.0.x with the one change that j2seClassLoader will be a protected rather than private field in 7.0.x. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
