https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54178
--- Comment #3 from wan...@126.com ---
thanks for your comments, but most of the time it works properly, just
occasionally, it calls the wrong function.
as you said filter may change this.
I checked the code of the two filter,
one set th
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/934
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Sou
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 21 23:59:38 2012
New Revision: 1412368
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412368&view=rev
Log:
Updates for 7.0.33 release
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-70.xm
Author: markt
Date: Thu Nov 22 00:02:33 2012
New Revision: 1412371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412371&view=rev
Log:
Complete release date
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.33.
Apache Tomcat is an open source software implementation of the Java
Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies.
This release contains a small number of bug fixes and improvements
compared to version 7.0.32. The no
Background:
- WebSocket 1.0 will sit on top of Servlet 3.1's HTTP upgrade
- HTTP upgrade uses Servlet[Input|Output]Stream
- Non-blocking IO has been added to Servlet[Input|Output]Stream for
Servlet 3.1
- The way I implemented HTTP upgrade (separate processors so everything
is very light weight
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3587
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:39:29 2012
New Revision: 1412313
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412313&view=rev
Log:
Another fix for the websocket classes after API update
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tr
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:23:25 2012
New Revision: 1412306
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412306&view=rev
Log:
Fix location of websocket classes after API update
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/maven-plugin-2.1-SNAPSHOT/apidocs/org/apache/tomcat/maven/runner/package-frame.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/maven-plugin-2.1-SNAPSHOT/apidocs/org/apache/tomcat/maven/runner/package-frame.html?rev=1412305&r1=1412304&r2=1412305&view=
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/maven-plugin-2.1-SNAPSHOT/apidocs/org/apache/tomcat/maven/common/config/package-summary.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/maven-plugin-2.1-SNAPSHOT/apidocs/org/apache/tomcat/maven/common/config/package-summary.html?rev=1412305&r1=141230
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:13:57 2012
New Revision: 1412303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412303&view=rev
Log:
enforce commons-lang and commons-io version used
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-plugin/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-p
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:03:03 2012
New Revision: 1412295
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412295&view=rev
Log:
upgrade some plugins
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/maven-plugin/t
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:02:52 2012
New Revision: 1412293
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412293&view=rev
Log:
debug is a bit verbose for testing
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-plugin/src/test/resources/log4j2-test.xml
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat7-
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:02:34 2012
New Revision: 1412292
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412292&view=rev
Log:
oups missed to add log4j2 files
Added:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-plugin/src/test/resources/log4j2-test.xml
(with props)
tomcat/maven-plugin/tru
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:01:58 2012
New Revision: 1412290
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412290&view=rev
Log:
use our own dogfood: moving to log4j2 rather than logback
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-plugin/pom.xml
t
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:01:45 2012
New Revision: 1412289
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412289&view=rev
Log:
cleanup various dependencies and exclude some non needed coming by transitivity
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/common-tomcat-maven-plugin/pom.xml
tomcat/mave
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:01:31 2012
New Revision: 1412288
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412288&view=rev
Log:
force dependency plugin version
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/mav
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:01:22 2012
New Revision: 1412287
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412287&view=rev
Log:
use last logback version
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/maven-plug
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:01:11 2012
New Revision: 1412286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412286&view=rev
Log:
use last tomcat7 artifacts 7.0.33
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/m
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Nov 21 21:01:01 2012
New Revision: 1412285
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412285&view=rev
Log:
use last slf4j version
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/maven-plugin
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3585
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source St
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 21 20:20:40 2012
New Revision: 1412268
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412268&view=rev
Log:
Update to latest WebSocket API proposal
Checked against reference implementation with javap
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/websocket/
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/webs
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53986
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bill.tom...@beanfactory.co.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
Bug ID: 54184
Summary: Tomcat 7.0.32, IE & javascript comments - number of
dashes must be even
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status:
Rainer Jung kippdata.de> writes:
>
> Never have seen that one failing.
>
> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: arrays first differed at element [0];
> > expected:<...Jan/1970:01:00:00 +0[1]00]> but was:<...Jan/1970:01:00:00
> > +0[0]00]> at
> >
org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.
The ASF has a Apache Comments System. It was started by a committer of
the web server project in order to allow users to add comments to live
docs web pages. It is currently by the web server and the trafficserver
projects. The experience at the web server project is very positive.
Most comments do
On 21.11.2012 14:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/11/2012 13:40, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> This should have been fixed very recently by r1410770 about 4
>>> days ago. Please check if your TC 7 checkout already contains
>>> that revision.
>
>> This unit test fails for me even in the 7.0.33 bundl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/11/2012 13:38, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Not sure if my vote is binding (probably not),
Correct. Only PMC member votes are binding.
> but I might recommend -1 Broken -- see the very end for unit test
> failures in AccessLogValve.
That is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/11/2012 13:40, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> This should have been fixed very recently by r1410770 about 4
>> days ago. Please check if your TC 7 checkout already contains
>> that revision.
>
> This unit test fails for me even in the 7.0.33 bund
Rainer,
On 11/21/12 8:33 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 21.11.2012 13:34, Toby Hobson wrote:
>> I'm trying to build the latest source code which I've checked out from
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk.
>>
>> I created a build.properties file and I'm able to successfully build To
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-taglibs-standard has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Mark,
On 11/18/12 6:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
On 21.11.2012 13:34, Toby Hobson wrote:
> I'm trying to build the latest source code which I've checked out from
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk.
>
> I created a build.properties file and I'm able to successfully build Tomcat
> using the default ant goal. However a few tests
On 21/11/2012 12:44, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 12:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/11/2012 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> The pieces were OK, when I downloaded them from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7 on Monday
>>> evening.
>>
>> It is varies by user agent.
On 11/21/2012 11:53 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
On 11/20/2012 11:42 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 11/20/2012 06:25 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
I'm also anxiously awaiting 1.0.11 (specifically the procrun piece) -- albeit
separately from Tomcat.
Originally there was talk of kicking off 1.0.11 this week, but I
On 11/21/2012 12:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/11/2012 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
The pieces were OK, when I downloaded them from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7 on Monday evening.
It is varies by user agent. Some handle the double compression
correctly. Some don't.
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 21 12:05:43 2012
New Revision: 998
Log:
Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
Added:
release/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
- copied from r997, dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
Removed:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
-
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 21 12:05:43 2012
New Revision: 998
Log:
Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.33
Added:
release/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
- copied from r997, dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
Removed:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
-
The following votes were received:
+1 (binding) : yoavs, mturk, rjung, markt, kkolinko, olamy
No other votes were cast.
The release vote for 7.0.33 therefore passes.
I'll make the release bits available in the next few minutes and will
announce the release (probably later today) once most of t
On 21/11/2012 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 21.11.2012 12:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 21/11/2012 09:22, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dis
On 21.11.2012 12:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/11/2012 09:22, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
>>>
>>> It can be obtained from:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0
On 21.11.2012 10:22, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
>
> I tested the .zip version, but when t
On 21/11/2012 09:22, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
>
> I tested the .zip version, but when t
On 11/20/2012 11:42 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 11/20/2012 06:25 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
I'm also anxiously awaiting 1.0.11 (specifically the procrun piece)
-- albeit separately from Tomcat.
Originally there was talk of kicking off 1.0.11 this week, but I've
not seen any information about test bu
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54178
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
I tested the .zip version, but when trying .tar.gz
I'm getting the:
$tar zxf apache-tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53869
--- Comment #10 from Sheldon Shao ---
Actually, There are 8-level tag files cascaded in our page. You can refer this
screenshot.
In this screenshot. Index.jsp was hit 80 times. It has almost 1 ELs in
runtime. In this situation, JspCont
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54178
--- Comment #1 from wan...@126.com ---
Created attachment 29615
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29615&action=edit
picture of the wrong stack catched by wireshark.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54178
Bug ID: 54178
Summary: MESSAGE POST to tomcat, but it called doGet
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.23
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: no
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53301
wan...@126.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wan...@126.com
--
You are receivi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54177
--- Comment #2 from Jochen Schwarze ---
I haven't seen other cases so far. (Using Non-US-ASCII characters in worker
names might be regarded unwise and can be avoided easily ... ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
53 matches
Mail list logo
