Mark, On 11/18/12 6:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting. > > It can be obtained from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/ > The Maven staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-043/ > The svn tag is: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_33/ > > The proposed 7.0.33 release is: > [ ] Broken - do not release > [ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable
Not sure if my vote is binding (probably not), but I might recommend -1
Broken -- see the very end for unit test failures in AccessLogValve.
Environment:
Debian Linux Squeeze
OpenSSL 0.9.8o (Debian Packaged)
APR 1.4.2 (Debian Packaged)
Sun/Oracle Java 1.6.0_26 64-bit (Debian Packaged)
Apache ant 1.8.2
+ md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33.zip): Matches
+ GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33.zip): Matches
+ md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz): Matches
+ GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33.tar.gz): Matches
+ md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33.exe): Matches
+ GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33.exe): Matches
+ Binary Zip and tarball:Same
+ md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.zip): Matches
+ GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.zip): Matches
+ md5(apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.tar.gz): Matches
+ GPG verify (apache-tomcat-7.0.33-src.tar.gz): Matches
+ Source Zip and tarball:Same
+ Deps download and compile cleanly (DBCP has some ant warnings)
+ tcnative builds cleanly (a few minor warnings using GCC 4.4.5 glibc
2.11.3)
+ Tomcat Source builds cleanly (some deprecation warnings)
/ Tribes unit tests fail (this is expected, right?)
- Other unit test failures:
TEST-org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.APR.txt:Tests run: 1,
Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.078 sec
Testcase: testBug54044 took 0.065 sec
FAILED
arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00
[+00]00]> but was:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00]>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: arrays first differed at element
[0]; expected:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00]> but
was:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00]>
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.testBug54044(TestAccessLogValve.java:52)
---------
TEST-org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.BIO.txt:Tests run: 1,
Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.048 sec
Testcase: testBug54044 took 0.034 sec
FAILED
arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00
[+00]00]> but was:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00]>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: arrays first differed at element
[0]; expected:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00]> but
was:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00]>
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.testBug54044(TestAccessLogValve.java:52)
---------
TEST-org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.NIO.txt:Tests run: 1,
Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.082 sec
Testcase: testBug54044 took 0.059 sec
FAILED
arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00
[+00]00]> but was:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00]>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: arrays first differed at element
[0]; expected:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [+00]00]> but
was:<...1/Dec/1969:19:00:00 [-05]00]>
at
org.apache.catalina.valves.TestAccessLogValve.testBug54044(TestAccessLogValve.java:52)
Looks like the time zone is either not being calculated properly or not
being printed to the output stream properly.
-chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
