r718796 seems to work fine for me
in r718819 tomcat wont even startup
I think we need to roll back the mass checkins done lately, please don't
roll my checkins back, they are simple but important bug fixes
Filipz
-
To unsubs
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46247
Summary: SVN property patches
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46246
--- Comment #3 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 18:08:34 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22904)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22904)
Set SVN properties for jasper
--
Configure bugmail: https://i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46246
--- Comment #1 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 18:07:16 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22902)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22902)
Set SVN properties for connectors
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46246
--- Comment #2 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 18:07:45 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22903)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22903)
Set SVN properties for containers
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46246
Summary: SVN property patches
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: Unknown
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compon
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #11 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 17:46:56 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22901)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22901)
RAT output listing after applying all patches
The RAT listing
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #10 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 17:43:19 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22900)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22900)
One more container file to patch
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #9 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 17:28:49 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> In fact for 4.x, anything in servlet API can (should?) be left as is.
>
Apart from build.xml, which is the only file patched ...
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22898|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mim
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22896|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mim
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22897|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mim
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22895|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 17:05:07 PST ---
In fact for 4.x, anything in servlet API can (should?) be left as is.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 17:03:50 PST ---
You have attached the connectors patch twice, rather than the container patch.
The spec related DTDs are mostly third party that we need to leave alone.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #5 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 16:47:16 PST ---
Note that there are still a lot of DTD and JSP files to do.
It was not clear to me if all the DTDs are ASF files or if some are 3rd party.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #4 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 16:45:29 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22898)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22898)
ServletAPI patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #2 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 16:44:41 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22896)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22896)
Connectors patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #3 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 16:45:04 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22897)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22897)
jasper patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
--- Comment #1 from Sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 16:44:14 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=22895)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22895)
Patch for containers
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
Summary: Patches for adding AL headers to sources
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: Unknown
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
hi Christophe, we are definitely interested in your contribution and
would like to include it.
Would you mind opening a bugzilla issue and attach your files there?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
thanks
Filip
Christophe Dupriez wrote:
Hi Tomcat Developpers!
Few days ago I pr
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 16:10:48 2008
New Revision: 719136
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719136&view=rev
Log:
Relax generics checks otherwise an call with a Properties object will not
compile.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/IntrospectionUtils.java
Modified
Hi Tomcat Developpers!
Few days ago I provided an NTLM Authenticator. My users reported that their
POST requests are now without content.
I traced and I can confirm that, when entering the
NtlmAuthenticator.authenticate method, request.ContentLength() is -1 for GET
transactions (and it works) b
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44705
David Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Nov 19 15:41:04 2008
New Revision: 719131
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719131&view=rev
Log:
fixes in NIO
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?re
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Nov 19 15:39:17 2008
New Revision: 719129
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719129&view=rev
Log:
Fix SEND_FILE bug, with Java NIO you can only change the key interest ops on
the poller thread, so we have to make sure we fire off an event
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/ja
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44679
--- Comment #28 from David Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 15:39:09 PST
---
(In reply to comment #27)
> The latest version of ServerCookie is NOT in 5.5.27, only in the 6.0.x branch.
>
Thanks for this information ...
--
Confi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44679
--- Comment #27 from Ivan Brusic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 15:35:46 PST
---
Can anyone confirm that this fix is included with the recent Tomcat 5.5.27
release?
(In reply to comment #19)
> Can anyone confirm that this fix is includ
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45621
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45613
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 15:16:05 2008
New Revision: 719125
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719125&view=rev
Log:
Fix generics and use of deprecated field
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/buildutil/Txt2Html.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/buildutil/
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 15:15:08 2008
New Revision: 719124
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719124&view=rev
Log:
Deprecate class that is no longer used.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/Apr.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/Apr.java
URL:
http://svn.
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 15:07:20 2008
New Revision: 719119
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719119&view=rev
Log:
Deprecate classes that are no longer used.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/collections/EmptyEnumeration.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 15:03:01 2008
New Revision: 719117
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719117&view=rev
Log:
More generics fixes
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/IntrospectionUtils.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/StringCache.java
to
sebb wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> sebb wrote:
>> >> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> sebb wrote:
>> >> >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> sebb wrote:
> >> >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Nov 19 14:26:06 2008
New Revision: 719096
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719096&view=rev
Log:
fix NPE risk
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
URL:
htt
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Nov 19 14:14:57 2008
New Revision: 719093
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719093&view=rev
Log:
keep the correct default value
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SocketProperties.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/Soc
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 14:14:47 2008
New Revision: 719092
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719092&view=rev
Log:
Tab police
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/collections/MultiMap.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/collections/MultiMapNamesEnumerati
sebb wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> sebb wrote:
>> >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>>
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> The source ta
sebb wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
>> >> > http://tomcat.apac
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 13:28:53 2008
New Revision: 719081
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719081&view=rev
Log:
Correct svn link.
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/svn.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/v
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > However, there are several binary files that are different:
> >
> > connectors/jni/native/os/win32/logmessages.bin
> > connectors/procrun/bin.../tomcat*.exe
> >
> > This suggests a packaging error - perhaps these bin file
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apac
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 19 13:07:07 2008
New Revision: 719071
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=719071&view=rev
Log:
Update old doc
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/procrun/README.txt
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/procrun/README.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/conn
sebb wrote:
> However, there are several binary files that are different:
>
> connectors/jni/native/os/win32/logmessages.bin
> connectors/procrun/bin.../tomcat*.exe
>
> This suggests a packaging error - perhaps these bin files were
> incorrectly formatted to correct the line-endings?
Looks like.
sebb wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
>> > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
>>
>
> I just ran RAT on the source archive.
>
> Th
On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The source tarball and other packages are available here:
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
>
I just ran RAT on the source archive.
There are a lot of source fi
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
Hashes and sigs all work OK now.
However there are some problems with the archives.
==
There are two copies of the source,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46243
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19
10:42:06 PST ---
I think I agree with your rationale, but not your conclusion. (Don't worry, I
know about authentication safety... I'm the dev lead on securityfilte
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Toby K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Summary: Tomcat doesn't start and gives socket connection errors
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.23
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
Status: NEW
Severity: cr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46243
--- Comment #1 from Tim Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 09:51:37 PST ---
My preference is to make this WONTFIX. The rationale is for one of safety. Its
common to have a filter perform authentication, authorization, even set up
thing
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46243
Summary: Filter init() fails, still put into service
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.26
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I had network troubles during the upload and I had to retry several times.
> >> I thought it completed without error but it looks like
> >> apache-tomcat-4.1.39-
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > Sorry, just discovered the problem.
> >
> > The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243.
> > I'll know next time...
>
>
> Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have
> t
sebb wrote:
> Sorry, just discovered the problem.
>
> The key id is not 33C60243 (as reported by GPGV); it is 0x33C60243.
> I'll know next time...
Yep - that'll be the problem. When you search for key IDs you always have
to use hexadecimal format and prefix the id with "0x" (note zero, not the
le
sebb wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I had network troubles during the upload and I had to retry several times.
>> I thought it completed without error but it looks like
>> apache-tomcat-4.1.39-LE-jdk14.exe got corrupted during the upload. The MD5
>> and sig is
On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> > > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
> > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
> >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
> >>
> >> According to the release process
sebb wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
>> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is:
>> [X] Broken
>
> The sigs and hashes don't agre
On 19/11/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The source tarball and other packages are available here:
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
> >
> > According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is:
>
> >
On 19/11/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The source tarball and other packages are available here:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
>
> According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is:
> [X] Broken
The sigs and hashes don't agree with their targets, e
The source tarball and other packages are available here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.39/
According to the release process, the 4.1.39 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers,
Mark
-
To
67 matches
Mail list logo
