Bug report for Watchdog [2007/03/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/03/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/03/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/03/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

svn commit: r514549 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/security-3.html docs/security-4.html xdocs/security-3.xml xdocs/security-4.xml

Author: markt Date: Sun Mar 4 20:51:36 2007 New Revision: 514549 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514549 Log: Add more CVE reports to the security pages. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-3.html tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/secu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41531] - By default container managed security doesn't rewrite form action

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41747] - error in ant task description

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r514532 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs: changelog.xml manager-howto.xml

Author: markt Date: Sun Mar 4 19:05:49 2007 New Revision: 514532 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514532 Log: Port fix for bug 41747. Correct minor error in ant script example for deploy. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps

svn commit: r514531 - in /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs: changelog.xml manager-howto.xml

Author: markt Date: Sun Mar 4 19:05:32 2007 New Revision: 514531 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514531 Log: Fix bug 41747. Corrent minor error in ant script example for deploy. Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/

svn commit: r514530 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: markt Date: Sun Mar 4 18:59:16 2007 New Revision: 514530 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514530 Log: Small fix. (Copied rather than moved entry) Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Tagging 5.5.24

Sorry about the hassle, looks like some printStacktrace statements made their way into 5.5.23, creating an ugly and confusing startup. I will retag 5.5.24, Monday March 5th, 2007 at 12.00pm Mountain time. The build will be done shortly after, I will announce the binaries after I have run the T

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.23

damnit, that is my fault. although, functionality wise this does nothing, but it picked up a changed version of the life cycle listener. I take full responsibility for screwing this one up, I didn't even pay attention when I ran the tests on the build. Sorry about that everyone, I will email

Re: Debugging tomcat

I'd take this to the user list, that's the best place to get help Filip Sven Köhler wrote: On the tomcat side: depending on your exact connectors, set Log Level for org.apache.jk, org.apache.ajp, org.apache.coyote to debug. I tried appending "org.apache.level = FINE" to logging.propertie

svn commit: r514468 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/modeler/modules/MbeansDescriptorsDigesterSource.java

Author: remm Date: Sun Mar 4 12:38:54 2007 New Revision: 514468 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514468 Log: - Minor optimization Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/modeler/modules/MbeansDescriptorsDigesterSource.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41759] - Migration from 5.5.20 to 6.0.10: parser issue on application deployment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41759] - Migration from 5.5.20 to 6.0.10: parser issue on application deployment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41758] - after creating CA tomcat is asking for restart

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK2 confusion

On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 21:26 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > Not even that. We are talking for more then a year for > > a next generation binary http(s) protocol. > > > > Almost everyone agreed that we need > > at least few things: > > 1. Encryption > > 2. Variable sized

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41759] - Migration from 5.5.20 to 6.0.10: parser issue on application deployment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41759] - Migration from 5.5.20 to 6.0.10: parser issue on application deployment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41759] New: - Migration from 5.5.20 to 6.0.10: parser issue on application deployment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: mod_jk release tool chain

On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 10:19 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed, that we could standardize a bit more on the tool chain used > for releasing mod_jk. > > 1) Building configure > > During the release process, the configure script gets build, which uses > autoconf, automake, m4 and libtoo

Debugging Apache/mod_jk (worker) fault on AIX

Eric reported very strange mod_jk behaviour using it with Apache 2.0/worker on AIX. I start a new mail thread, because until now all the discussion is part of non-specific threads. Eric: could you please open a bugzilla (issues.apache.org), so that we can track the issue? Also: When you compile

mod_jk release tool chain

Hi, I noticed, that we could standardize a bit more on the tool chain used for releasing mod_jk. 1) Building configure During the release process, the configure script gets build, which uses autoconf, automake, m4 and libtool. In the last year or so I used autoconf: 2.60 automake: 1.9.6 m4: 1.

svn commit: r514377 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: HOWTO-RELEASE tools/jkrelease.sh

Author: rjung Date: Sun Mar 4 01:13:03 2007 New Revision: 514377 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514377 Log: Automate inclusion of all news file when generating NEWS ascii file using jkrelease.sh. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/HOWTO-RELEASE tomcat/connectors/trunk/j

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Tomcat Connectors 1.2.21

Even if it's post release: Jean-Frederic schrieb: > Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.21 is: > [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions > [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is > [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are -