Hi all…. Quick update that I merged SOLR-16842 into main.
I wanted to confirm that our Jenkins builds are still happy, and while our
normal Jenkins boxes are busted, I see that we have “Solr-Check-main-s390x”?
Looking at it, it appears that recent code merges are fine, that the one test
that
I don’t care if this is 10x only; that’s the easiest path
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 1:18 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Hi all…. Quick update that I merged SOLR-16842 into main.
>
> I wanted to confirm that our Je
From an upgrade 9->10 perspective, it would be good to start getting
deprecation warnings in 9.x for old options and change scripts etc so you don't
have a big-bang moment in 10.0.
A potential option 5) is to introduce the new options and deprecate old in
10.0, meaning they won't be removed unt
I was thinking of using Solr's "benchmark" module/thing to benchmark
parallel segment search (coming to Solr 9.7 but needs more love). I
don't notice any substantial data to query for in this module,
however. Has anyone considered adding wikipedia, like how Lucene's
"luceneutil" does? Or somethi
> I wanted to confirm that our Jenkins builds are still happy, and while our
> normal Jenkins boxes are busted
The boxes are fixed! Or, lucene-solr-1 should be at least. I'm still
looking into lucene-solr-2. So any failures at this point are
legitimate issues.
Case in point, it looks like our
Thanks so much Jason for investing your time to fix the build machines!
RE timeout -- we ought to explicitly set a timeout so as to not hog
the machine indefinitely. For Bats, I don't know where that is. I've
done changes in the recent past for normal / JUnit tests.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 5:42
Yes. In fact I have an example in JesterJ of indexing the luceneutil
data... (but it's still in early stages, I think it's still against
_default schema, perhaps... (need to look again, haven't had time to work
on it recently)
https://github.com/nsoft/jesterj/tree/master/code/examples/wikidocs
On
To comment further, I think it would be good if we had query benchmarks
that tried to map directly to the queries benchmarked for lucene, against
the same data. This would give us a notion of which half of the equation
any slow down comes from (or speed up!)
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 2:42 PM Gus Hec
Hi David,
I'll publish benchmarks and steps to reproduce tests we are doing using
solr-bench. Let's collaborate a bit more to make sure we can extract
maximum performance out of the feature. Right now, I'm not seeing good
numbers and it is a bit worrisome.
Thanks and regards,
Ishan
On Sat, 29 Jun,
Off the top of my head:
git clone https://GitHub.com/fullstorydev/solr-bench
cd solr-bench
git checkout ishan/local-mode-fixes
mvn clean compile assembly:single
./cleanup.sh && ./stress.sh -c suites/stress-facets-local.json
(Replace commit with the commit id hash of the latest tip of branch_9x)
Might need to install the prerequisites on Linux as follows:
apt install wget unzip zip ant ivy lsof git netcat make openjdk-11-jdk
maven jq
Something similar for MacOS can be installed using homebrew etc. The jq and
maven are important.
On Sat, 29 Jun, 2024, 1:04 am Ishan Chattopadhyaya, <
icha
11 matches
Mail list logo
