Might need to install the prerequisites on Linux as follows: apt install wget unzip zip ant ivy lsof git netcat make openjdk-11-jdk maven jq
Something similar for MacOS can be installed using homebrew etc. The jq and maven are important. On Sat, 29 Jun, 2024, 1:04 am Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Off the top of my head: > > git clone https://GitHub.com/fullstorydev/solr-bench > cd solr-bench > git checkout ishan/local-mode-fixes > > mvn clean compile assembly:single > ./cleanup.sh && ./stress.sh -c <commit> suites/stress-facets-local.json > > (Replace commit with the commit id hash of the latest tip of branch_9x) > > On Sat, 29 Jun, 2024, 12:32 am Ishan Chattopadhyaya, < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi David, >> I'll publish benchmarks and steps to reproduce tests we are doing using >> solr-bench. Let's collaborate a bit more to make sure we can extract >> maximum performance out of the feature. Right now, I'm not seeing good >> numbers and it is a bit worrisome. >> Thanks and regards, >> Ishan >> >> On Sat, 29 Jun, 2024, 12:14 am Gus Heck, <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> To comment further, I think it would be good if we had query benchmarks >>> that tried to map directly to the queries benchmarked for lucene, against >>> the same data. This would give us a notion of which half of the equation >>> any slow down comes from (or speed up!) >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 2:42 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Yes. In fact I have an example in JesterJ of indexing the luceneutil >>> > data... (but it's still in early stages, I think it's still against >>> > _default schema, perhaps... (need to look again, haven't had time to >>> work >>> > on it recently) >>> > >>> > https://github.com/nsoft/jesterj/tree/master/code/examples/wikidocs >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:33 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I was thinking of using Solr's "benchmark" module/thing to benchmark >>> >> parallel segment search (coming to Solr 9.7 but needs more love). I >>> >> don't notice any substantial data to query for in this module, >>> >> however. Has anyone considered adding wikipedia, like how Lucene's >>> >> "luceneutil" does? Or something else? Is this a bad idea for this >>> >> benchmark module or should I be looking elsewhere like Searchscale's >>> >> solr-bench[1]? >>> >> >>> >> https://github.com/searchscale/solr-bench >>> >> >>> >> ~ David Smiley >>> >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > -- >>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>> > https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>> https://a.co/d/b2sZLD9 (my fantasy fiction book) >>> >>
