We have suggestions to split into a separate repo (along with fixing it) and
removing it altogether. In the spirit of ASF do-ocracy, are there any
volunteers to take on the former?
This has an affect on the 1.2.0 release since the spark connector is part of
the release but needs further work b
I agree with Mark and Anthony ...
+1 to deleting this altogether.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM, John Blum wrote:
> Perhaps the bigger question is, is anyone even using the connector? No
> sense in supporting something that isn't used by anyone when those efforts
> could be utilized elsewhere
Perhaps the bigger question is, is anyone even using the connector? No
sense in supporting something that isn't used by anyone when those efforts
could be utilized elsewhere (e.g. Redis Protocol Adapter/Data Structures).
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Mark Bretl wrote:
> I have similar though
I have similar thoughts as Anthony on this issue. No matter if it is a
separate repo or branch I think it will be left behind.
I think the bigger question is does this community want to continue to
support the connector?
--Mark
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:34 AM Ernest Burghardt
wrote:
> +1 on A
+1 on A
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michael William Dodge
wrote:
> +1 for A
>
> > On 24 May, 2017, at 21:30, Jared Stewart wrote:
> >
> > +1 for A
> >
> > On May 24, 2017 6:48 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for A
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Jianxia Chen wrote:
> >>
> >
+1
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
> +1 to moving it from develop to it's own repo and gradle build. The
> spark-connector is another quintessential project that should be treated as
> an external module to geode.
>
>
> On 5/25/17 07:58, Anthony Baker wrote:
>
>> I agree wi
+1 for A
> On 24 May, 2017, at 21:30, Jared Stewart wrote:
>
> +1 for A
>
> On May 24, 2017 6:48 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote:
>
>> +1 for A
>>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Jianxia Chen wrote:
>>
>>> I prefer option A: Move it into it's own repository, with it's own
>> release
>>> cycle.
>
+1 to moving it from develop to it's own repo and gradle build. The
spark-connector is another quintessential project that should be treated
as an external module to geode.
On 5/25/17 07:58, Anthony Baker wrote:
I agree with Anil that the spark-connector is woefully behind. The spark
commun
I agree with Anil that the spark-connector is woefully behind. The spark
community is moving fast and the connector is based on a 2yo release. That
code hasn’t seen much activity outside of rebranding. If we split it out into
a different repo it just moves the problem—is anyone volunteering t
+1 for A
On May 24, 2017 6:48 PM, "Kirk Lund" wrote:
> +1 for A
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Jianxia Chen wrote:
>
> > I prefer option A: Move it into it's own repository, with it's own
> release
> > cycle.
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Our geode-s
+1 for A
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Jianxia Chen wrote:
> I prefer option A: Move it into it's own repository, with it's own release
> cycle.
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>
> > Our geode-spark-connector needs some work. It's currently building
> against
> > geode
I prefer option A: Move it into it's own repository, with it's own release
cycle.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Our geode-spark-connector needs some work. It's currently building against
> geode 1.0.0-incubating, because it has it's own separate build process.
> It's also s
The spark has come a long way after 1.3...The connector needs to be
upgraded to be meaningful
+1 for A
The existing code could be used as a reference in the future...
-Anil.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Our geode-spark-connector needs some work. It's currently buildi
13 matches
Mail list logo
