+1 on A On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michael William Dodge <mdo...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1 for A > > > On 24 May, 2017, at 21:30, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > +1 for A > > > > On May 24, 2017 6:48 PM, "Kirk Lund" <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> +1 for A > >> > >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Jianxia Chen <jc...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> > >>> I prefer option A: Move it into it's own repository, with it's own > >> release > >>> cycle. > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Our geode-spark-connector needs some work. It's currently building > >>> against > >>>> geode 1.0.0-incubating, because it has it's own separate build > process. > >>>> It's also somewhat out of date, we're building against spark 1.3. Is > >>> anyone > >>>> actually using the spark connector? > >>>> > >>>> I think we need to get the spark connector out of the main geode repo > >>> since > >>>> people are currently modifying code in the connector without even > >>> compiling > >>>> it, since it's not linked into the gradle build. > >>>> > >>>> What do the geode devs think we should do with the > >> geode-spark-connector? > >>>> > >>>> A) Move it into it's own repository, with it's own release cycle > >>>> B) Delete it > >>>> C) Other?? > >>>> > >>>> -Dan > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
