+1 for A On May 24, 2017 6:48 PM, "Kirk Lund" <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for A > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Jianxia Chen <jc...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > I prefer option A: Move it into it's own repository, with it's own > release > > cycle. > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > Our geode-spark-connector needs some work. It's currently building > > against > > > geode 1.0.0-incubating, because it has it's own separate build process. > > > It's also somewhat out of date, we're building against spark 1.3. Is > > anyone > > > actually using the spark connector? > > > > > > I think we need to get the spark connector out of the main geode repo > > since > > > people are currently modifying code in the connector without even > > compiling > > > it, since it's not linked into the gradle build. > > > > > > What do the geode devs think we should do with the > geode-spark-connector? > > > > > > A) Move it into it's own repository, with it's own release cycle > > > B) Delete it > > > C) Other?? > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > >
