_
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobu
ce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as
the REST server to ser
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as
the REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON d
_
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server i
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using
(e.g.
releases) easier, not unlike the Kafka connector, or even Spring Data for that
matter.
$0.02
-j
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimen
.
>
>$0.02
>-j
>
>____________________
> From: Bruce Schuchardt
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
>To: dev@geode.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
&
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as the
REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn&#x
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else
but still fail to see the value in keeping it
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else
but still fail
the Kafka connector, or even Spring Data for that
matter.
$0.02
-j
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 11:41 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as the REST
server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better at it.
On 3/29/21, 10:33 AM, "John Bl
___
From: Mike Martell
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
client/server interface
As the only remaining member on the CSharpDriver team, I
ay, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else but
still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a branch unless
someone i
: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
I worked on the protobuf client/server interface as long as anyone else but
still fail to see the value in keeping it in anything but a branch unless
someone is going to pick it up soon and comple
them are harder to remove from a technical perspective or neither experimental
nor deprecated and would thus require a Geode 2.0.
From: Udo Kohlmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 14:54
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re:
EST protocol, which also uses json.
-Dan
From: Mike Martell
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
As the only remaining member on the CSharpDrive
ult was to convert PDX objects to JSON. That was about as
efficient as the existing REST protocol, which also uses json.
-Dan
From: Mike Martell
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:53 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf cli
remove from a technical perspective or neither experimental nor
deprecated and would thus require a Geode 2.0.
From: Udo Kohlmeyer
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 14:54
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protob
de.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server
interface
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this proj
Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out of
Geode.
I understand that the
-1
Given that I was on the team that started this initiative, I will naturally
have an inclination to say 'No'.
I don't know if I would go as far as removing this project/initiative out of
Geode.
I understand that the way that was used to hook into Geode was less the
perfect, and I fully supp
o client for Apache Geode.It
> uses Geode's new protobuf-based client protocol to communicate with
> locators and servers.
> github.com
>
> ________________
> From: Alexander Murmann
> Sent: Tuesday,
Geode's new protobuf-based client protocol to communicate with locators and
servers.
github.com
From: Alexander Murmann
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:46 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf
ect: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for remo
+1 for removal
From: Mark Hanson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal.
On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" wrote:
I
+1 for removal.
On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" wrote:
I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread
monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated.
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Tu
+1
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
From: Darrel Schneider
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:46:24 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
I'm in favor of its removal. I was
I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread
monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated.
From: Bruce Schuchardt
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:16 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] removal
29 matches
Mail list logo
