Given this is on stall https://github.com/gemfire/geode-go-client I'd say +1
for removal
[https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/194656?s=400&v=4]<https://github.com/gemfire/geode-go-client>
GitHub - gemfire/geode-go-client<https://github.com/gemfire/geode-go-client>
What is this? This is the beginning of a Go client for Apache Geode.It uses
Geode's new protobuf-based client protocol to communicate with locators and
servers.
github.com
________________________________
From: Alexander Murmann <amurm...@vmware.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:46 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal
________________________________
From: Mark Hanson <hans...@vmware.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44
To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
+1 for removal.
On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" <dar...@vmware.com> wrote:
I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread
monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated.
________________________________
From: Bruce Schuchardt <bru...@vmware.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:16 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org>
Subject: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
Hi folks,
We’ve had an experimental client/server interface in Geode that no-one to
my knowledge is using. We’re testing it with every build and are having to
make changes to it to keep it up to date with the rest of the project. The
last change of substance to the geode-protobuf sub-project, for instance, was
in 2018 but that’s been followed by many incidental commits.
GEM-8997<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-8997&data=04%7C01%7Camurmann%40vmware.com%7Cdb5a8b73fdf14b1dce0c08d8ee2bc22d%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521219012361419%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rsn7U6WRKcH5Q%2FMUdRj5%2BO%2Fg%2B0vXtlQYql8eVLJAjnQ%3D&reserved=0>
was opened to have the sub-projects for this interface removed. I’ve prepared
a pull
request<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F6168&data=04%7C01%7Camurmann%40vmware.com%7Cdb5a8b73fdf14b1dce0c08d8ee2bc22d%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521219012361419%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=AqZymHsYnq804zdT4uL49c5173HtE%2FsmfohoPcf6UEg%3D&reserved=0>
to remove it and would like to get consensus to move forward with that effort.
