+1 Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Darrel Schneider <dar...@vmware.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:46:24 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface
I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode thread monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more complicated. ________________________________ From: Bruce Schuchardt <bru...@vmware.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:16 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> Subject: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Hi folks, We’ve had an experimental client/server interface in Geode that no-one to my knowledge is using. We’re testing it with every build and are having to make changes to it to keep it up to date with the rest of the project. The last change of substance to the geode-protobuf sub-project, for instance, was in 2018 but that’s been followed by many incidental commits. GEM-8997<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-8997&data=04%7C01%7Cnnag%40vmware.com%7C741e8440552d40c7325a08d8ee12da18%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521112029463086%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=7U2dP9zH1rcOdZTzbLbxWmIASQhhQlIQ0OOt32KS7AI%3D&reserved=0> was opened to have the sub-projects for this interface removed. I’ve prepared a pull request<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F6168&data=04%7C01%7Cnnag%40vmware.com%7C741e8440552d40c7325a08d8ee12da18%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521112029463086%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=zfwj1LUu1vKc5PKioP4KhWyPkJsIlkpUUcucjfB%2Fx%2BQ%3D&reserved=0> to remove it and would like to get consensus to move forward with that effort.
