On 6/27/2025 12:46 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
27/06/2025 12:44, Thomas Monjalon:
20/06/2025 15:37, Bruce Richardson:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
This issue was reported by static analysis. It is a false positive,
because both `rte_socket_count` and `rte_soc
27/06/2025 12:44, Thomas Monjalon:
> 20/06/2025 15:37, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> > > This issue was reported by static analysis. It is a false positive,
> > > because both `rte_socket_count` and `rte_socket_id_by_idx` only report
> > >
20/06/2025 15:37, Bruce Richardson:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> > This issue was reported by static analysis. It is a false positive,
> > because both `rte_socket_count` and `rte_socket_id_by_idx` only report
> > information about physical sockets, and these
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
> This issue was reported by static analysis. It is a false positive,
> because both `rte_socket_count` and `rte_socket_id_by_idx` only report
> information about physical sockets, and these specific calls are made
> during EAL initia
4 matches
Mail list logo