On 6/27/2025 12:46 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
27/06/2025 12:44, Thomas Monjalon:
20/06/2025 15:37, Bruce Richardson:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
This issue was reported by static analysis. It is a false positive,
because both `rte_socket_count` and `rte_socket_id_by_idx` only report
information about physical sockets, and these specific calls are made
during EAL initialization, so no other sockets (i.e. external) could have
been available, so it is pretty much impossible to get invalid return here.
Still, to avoid future false positives, we can fix it here.
Coverity issue: 470131
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
Applied, thanks?
Sorry for this typo, it was not supposed to be a question mark.
Yes you absolutely deserve some thanks for your continuous maintenance
of the DPDK memory subsystem. Thank you Anatoly :)
Thanks for the kind words, and yes, I did infer it was a typo :)
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
